Laserfiche WebLink
road vs. urban street) and the nature of the heavy traffic loading (very heavy loads concentrated <br />in time and space vs. legal loads applied consistently over long periods of time, and often in <br />perpetuity). <br />Methods of Pavement Design and Analysis <br />The Heavy Traffic Generators project utilized three methods of pavement design and analysis for <br />estimating the damage and the related cost associated with heavy traffic loads. These are <br />described below. <br />• Incremental Design This method involves the design of two new pavements for future <br />service — one without any of the heavy vehicles in question, and one with the additional <br />heavy vehicle loads. The difference in the predicted construction cost of these two <br />pavements is assumed to be the direct result of the additional loads. This additional cost <br />must be considered over the entire life of the pavement, since it represents the additional <br />pavement structure that must be built to accommodate the heavy vehicles over the life of <br />the pavement. <br />• Overlay Design This method uses the standard MnDOT overlay design method for <br />bituminous pavements. After a period of time, defined by the user, the expected damage <br />caused by additional heavy vehicles is computed, and an appropriate overlay thickness is <br />determined to accommodate the additional loads. The cost of the overlay is assumed to <br />be related directly to the additional damage caused by the heavy vehicles in question. <br />Often, however, the computed overlay thickness needed is less than the minimum <br />thickness that is appropriate for overlay construction. In this case, the owner has two <br />options: consider the cost to be that of the minimum overlay thickness, or set aside the <br />small cost and use it in a future overlay to be constructed at some later date. <br />• Percent of Life Consumed Comparing the amount of additional "life" consumed by <br />additional pavement loads each year with the annual or total loads for which the <br />pavement was designed. This approach computes the proportion of the reconstruction <br />cost based on the proportion of the original design life (in terms of ESALs) consumed by <br />the additional loads. <br />Pavement Damage Modeling <br />There are many methods of modeling the damage produced by traffic, and by heavy vehicles in <br />particular. Most of the research utilizes the standard AASHTO concept of serviceability (2) and <br />equivalent single axle load (ESAL) or some variation of that method. The AASHTO method is a <br />sound and viable way of conducting this type of analysis, however, and the references discussed <br />below support this. <br />Rutherford, South Dakota Department of Transportation, 1994 (3) <br />The South Dakota Department of Transportation hired GeoEngineers in 1994 to conduct a study <br />to develop a model for predicting the impact of heavy garbage trucks on city, county, and state <br />roads. This is likely the most comprehensive study undertaken on the subject, and it has many of <br />the components that are necessary to develop the impact analysis tool for the current project. <br />These include considerations of the following parameters. <br />