My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:48 PM
Creation date
3/7/2023 10:21:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/3/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
3/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Also, it may be more difficult for smaller haulers and entry level companies to break into and <br />grow their business in organized collection systems. <br />2.2 Occurrence of Each Type of Collection System <br />Studies have been conducted to try and determine the prevalence of open collection systems and <br />organized collection systems both locally and nationally. The following subsections present the <br />findings from studies completed locally (in Minnesota), in Iowa, Colorado and one study <br />completed across the United States and Canada. The findings show that there are variations in <br />the prevalence of types of collection systems. <br />2.2.1 Minnesota <br />2.2.1.1 Eden Prairie <br />In 2005, the city of Eden Prairie compiled a report titled "Report on Residential Municipal Solid <br />Waste Collection."' The report surveyed 108 cities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area and <br />provided a breakdown of their garbage and recycling collection systems according to open and <br />organized collection. The report noted that the most common system in these 108 communities <br />is an open system (77 of the 108 cities had open collection systems, 71.3% of the communities). <br />There were 29 cities with a contract for garbage collection and two (2) cities that collect <br />municipally. <br />Of the 77 cities that had open garbage collection in this 2005 study, 22 cities have contracts for <br />recycling collection. This leads to a percentage organized for recycling of 49.1%. <br />2.2.1.2 Twin Cities Metropolitan Area <br />A separate report titled "Comparative Economic Analysis of MSW and Recycling Collection in <br />the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area" completed in September, 19942 shows in Table II-3 that <br />based on survey responses, there were 155 municipalities with open systems for MSW collection <br />and 42 municipalities with organized collection of which three (3) were municipal collection. <br />The percentages in this report indicated 78.7% open; 19.8% organized by contract; and 1.5% <br />municipal collection arrangements at that time. <br />In the surveys completed as part of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area study, there were a total of <br />58 cities with a breakdown of their systems reported. All the cities were over 10,000 in <br />population in this study. Of the 58 cities that completed the survey, 37 were open for garbage <br />collection. This represents 64% as open systems for garbage collection. Of these 37 cities with <br />open garbage collection, 12 cities are organized for recycling collection or 21% of the total 58 <br />cities. There were 21 cities with both garbage and recycling handled in organized systems. The <br />total percentage of cities organized for recycling was 57%. <br />Based on these studies, it appears that the breakdown of percentage of cities in Minnesota <br />organized versus open may range as follows: <br />'Barone, Michael. Dec. 2005. "Report on Residential Municipal Solid Waste Collection." City of Eden Prairie, MN. <br />2 "Comparative Economic Analysis of MSW and Recycling Collection in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area." Sept. <br />1994. GBB Solid Waste Mgmnt. Consultants. Falls Church, VA. <br />R - Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements.doc Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC • 7 <br />June 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.