Laserfiche WebLink
For garbage, the first two (2) categories for "No program" and "Drop off only" are not applicable <br />for this report. The categories across the table from "Municipal" through "One private hauler" <br />would be categorized as organized in Minnesota terminology except for "Multiple licensed <br />hauler" which would be open. This equates to a total of 72.1% of the over 700 cities and <br />counties classified as organized. The "Multiple licensed hauler" and "Multiple haulers w/private <br />competition" would be classified as open and these total 23.2% of the over 700 cities and <br />counties responding. <br />For recycling, the same approach to a breakdown leads to a total of 66.8% organized cities and <br />counties and a total of 11.6% open (there were a total of 21.2% of the respondents with no <br />recycling or a drop off system only). <br />2.2.2.2 Fort Collins, Colorado <br />In July, 2008, the R3 Consulting Group, Inc. presented a study titled "Trash Services Study Final <br />Report to the City of Fort Collins, CO."4 Section 4 of the report included a review of collection <br />system structures. The report provided data on a survey conducted on 271 municipal <br />jurisdictions in Colorado. Of the 222 respondents, 47 (21%) provide municipal collection, 44 <br />(20%) contract for service, and 131 (59%) use private haulers in an open system. This study also <br />reported that a 1997 survey of residential collection in the 100 largest cities in the U.S. found <br />that exclusive municipal service was provided in 62% of the cities. An exclusive private <br />contractor was used in 18% for a total of 80% organized via either municipal or contract <br />collection. Only 6% of the cities had open systems with 15% having some combination of the <br />systems. <br />2.2.2.3 Portland, Oregon <br />The city of Portland, Oregon changed from an open solid waste and open recycling system to an <br />organized "franchise" system in 1990/1991. The City's curbside recycling program was initiated <br />in June 1987 but was not attaining City, Metro and State goals for participation and recovery <br />rates. After thorough research and planning, the City determined that other curbside recycling <br />programs in the U.S. have achieved substantially higher public participation rates and materials <br />recovery levels by providing weekly recycling collection, household recycling containers, <br />economic incentives to recycle in the garbage rate structure, and organized collection within <br />neighborhoods. <br />The City determined that the most efficient and cost effective method of making systematic <br />improvements was to "franchise" residential garbage, recycling and yard debris collection; and <br />establish standards for commercial garbage and recycling collection. The City Council then <br />adopted on September 19, 1990 a new ordinance (No. 163497) that locked in each hauler's <br />number of residential accounts (i.e., collection market size) as of September 30, 1990 as certified <br />by City examination and subsequent audits. <br />4 "Trash Services Study Final Report." July 2008. R3 Consulting Group, Inc. Fort Collins, CO. <br />10 •Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC R - Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements.doc <br />June 2009 <br />