My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Agenda Packets - 2023/03/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:48 PM
Creation date
3/7/2023 10:21:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/3/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
3/3/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
393
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2.4.3.4 Cities of Plymouth and Edina <br />The cities of Plymouth and Edina both currently have organized residential recycling collection <br />services. They also both have recently initiated recycling purchasing processes to procure <br />additional and new services for residential curbside recycling collection. In each case, a curbside <br />recycling RFP was developed by City staff, with review and approval by a contract legal <br />counsel. This legal opinion stated that the Cities must still follow the Organized Collection <br />statute in M.S. I I5A.94 if they wanted to include source separated organics (SSO) as a new <br />service to the recycling contracts. The cities were hoping to add SSO as a new recyclable <br />commodity as part of curbside recycling contract services. This legal opinion stated that <br />following the Organized Collection statute is required despite the amendment to the definition of <br />mixed MSW in the 2008 Regular Session of the Minnesota Legislature (Chapter 357 - S.F. No. <br />3056, Sections 32 and 33) and the addition of the new term "source -separated compostable <br />materials". This municipal legal opinion held that the definitions of "solid waste" or "recyclable <br />materials" was not changed with the Organized Collection statute (I 15A.94) and therefore such <br />expansion of the scope of curbside recycling services should trigger the Organized Collection <br />process (as per 115A.94). In both cases, the cities of Plymouth and Edina elected not to include <br />SSO collection and composting in the scope of services. <br />2.5 Issues Related to Collection Services <br />There are several potential issues associated with collection services that have been identified in <br />the work plan for this study. These issues are: <br />Costs of collection services to residents; <br />Waste generation/management; <br />Waste disposal/management; <br />Infrastructure costs; and <br />Accidents and safety. <br />This study researched these issues as part of the literature review task. The results of the <br />literature review research are presented in the following subsections. Some of these issues are <br />addressed again in later sections of this report. <br />2.5.1 Cost/Pricing <br />Rate surveys are a common practice in the evaluations conducted by cities when considering <br />whether to implement organized collection. As noted previously, it is common for these studies <br />to report that rates paid by households in organized systems are less than those paid in open <br />systems. This subsection provides highlights from a few of the data sources. <br />2.5.1.1 City of Falcon Heights <br />Exhibit 2-1 is a rate comparison provided in the city of Falcon Heights Organized Collection <br />Study: Final Report.24 <br />24 "Organized Collection Study: Final Report." Oct. 2004. City of Falcon Heights, Minnesota. <br />30 •Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC R - Analysis of Waste Collection Service Arrangements.doc <br />June 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.