My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Order-Other
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Charter Commission
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
Misc.
>
Membership Issues Removal Documents
>
Order-Other
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2023 12:15:58 PM
Creation date
3/20/2023 12:15:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Charter Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> <br />sleeping on the job). The court’s Findings of Fact in this case compel a conclusion that petitioner <br />failed to meet her burden of proving cause or sufficient cause for respondent’s removal from office. <br />4. Petitioner blames respondent for the city’s failure to act on proposed charter <br />amendments. According to Minn. Stat. § 410.12 (2018), there are multiple ways to amend a city’s <br />charter. First, qualified voters may petition to place a city charter amendment on the ballot for <br />voter approval. Id., subd. 2-4. Second, an amendment may be proposed by the City Council by <br />ordinance. Id., subd. 5. The ordinance is then submitted to the charter commission, which may <br />approve, reject, or amend the proposed amendment. Id. The council may submit to city voters the <br />amendment as originally proposed or as amended by the charter commission. Id. Finally, upon <br />recommendation of the charter commission, the city council may enact a charter amendment by <br />ordinance without submitting the question to voters. Id., subd. 7.1 <br />5. Section 410.12 does not prefer one amendment method over another. As such, the <br />failure of the city council or the charter commission to pass a charter amendment does not lead to <br />a conclusion that either was inefficient or ineffective. Moreover, if the Mounds View City Council <br />is frustrated that the Mounds View Charter Commission did not act on a proposed measure, the <br />City Council may, by statute, act on its own and submit the measure it passed to city voters or to <br />the Charter Commission. Minn. Stat. § 410.12, subd. 5 (2018). It is therefore both disingenuous <br />and inaccurate for the City Council to blame either the Charter Commission, a Charter <br />Commissioner, or a group of Charter Commissioners for the City of Mounds View’s failure to <br />enact a city charter amendment. <br />6. Petitioner blames respondent for the Charter Commission’s failure to operate with <br />a full membership complement. Petitioner failed to prove that respondent had anything to do with <br /> <br />1 Subdivision 7 also contains a vehicle by which voters may petition to place the charter amendment ordinance on the <br />ballot. Minn. Stat. § 410.12, subd. 7 (2018).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.