Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> 4. New Business: <br /> a) Groveland Park Building Replacement. —Initiate discussions on this topic. <br /> Attached is a park building usage summary. <br /> • Groveland and Random are the higher used building. <br /> • They are both old and need of repair. <br /> • The review of the park building this last year deemed that the <br /> repair was not the best solution of Groveland building. <br /> • There is $20,000 to start the design process for the Groveland <br /> Building in 2004. <br /> • There will be design costs for Groveland, regardless if the plans of <br /> the Hillview building is used. <br /> • Groveland and Hillview are currently the same size <br /> (approximately). <br /> • A serving counter similar to what is available at Silver View may <br /> be a nice amenity. The design of Groveland should include this. <br /> • Hillview plans could be used with some modification. <br /> • <br /> Motion to replace the building at Groveland Park using the Hillview design: <br /> Edmond <br /> 2nd: Long <br /> Discussion: <br /> • Hillview shelter open air porch was added on . <br /> • Commissioners next month look at Hillview shelter <br /> • Amendment was added by Kroeger to use the Hillview design as a base <br /> line and to add a kitchen / serving area. 2nd: Kunz <br /> • Next meeting bring Hillview plans and any sight plans of Groveland Park. <br /> Motion passed unanimously <br /> b) Skate Park—Initiate discussions on this topic. This item is currently in the <br /> City's Capital Improvement Program scheduled for 2004. It was not <br /> recommended in 2003. Does the Commission want to proceed with this, <br /> delay it, or remove it from the Capital Improvement Program? <br /> • Spend a lot of time on this already. <br /> • It might be good to let it"simmer". <br /> • Delay it until we find a suitable location of financing. <br /> • As presented last year, this was planned to be supervised. <br /> • Public Meeting was held, at the following Park and Recreation <br /> Meeting it was decided not to proceed with it. <br /> • Maintenance of the park would be derived for the City's general <br /> fund. <br /> • There were other financial needs of the City. <br /> 3 <br />