Laserfiche WebLink
- 7 <br /> Regarding the development of short range priorities within <br /> the park system, staff would envision that the process would <br /> • follow three steps : <br /> 1 . We would first review the parks and open space master plan <br /> once again. <br /> Establish priorities on a entire city basis . <br /> 2 . Take a look at each individual park and prioritize items <br /> within their respective park system. <br /> 3 . We would compile a final list which would have an individual <br /> breakdown of items by respective park , their cost and <br /> proposed funding source. <br /> To that end, staff has enclosed a listing of the park priorities <br /> by individual park with an estimated cost for improvement and <br /> a blank space for priority as well as a space for potential <br /> funding source. <br /> Staff would envision that we would probably need to break the <br /> priority list down even further than the enclosed list to reach <br /> within the $50 ,000 allotment staff is proposing per year but it <br /> will at least give us a position from which to begin . <br /> Staff fully realizes the following two things : <br /> • 1 . There is a great deal of work that needs to be accomplished <br /> once again by the Parks and Recreation Commission. <br /> 2 . The proposed plans provide somewhat of a different orientation <br /> for our department than from its previous direction. <br /> Staff would envision and welcome any discussions or conversations <br /> relating to this issue and do not expect the Commission to take <br /> any specific action at the March 24 , 1983 meeting . <br /> BKA/sll <br /> Attachment <br />