My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-84 Agenda & Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
08-23-84 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2024 1:54:00 PM
Creation date
5/10/2023 2:48:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i10 41,4191,4 . ° <br /> ' f <br /> 11.1i <br /> r+ �E 4 yi <br /> , I <br /> mss' f . � <br /> r <br /> I 0- <br /> ,... <br /> int di <br /> . . ,rte ' <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Rep. Darby Nelson is taking legislative steps to ease cities into a post-landfill era. <br /> 0 What Public Officials Can Do 1 <br /> About Landfills1 <br /> Minnesota's new law shifts the economic balance between landfilling and <br /> recycling—and provides funds for recovering solid wastes. <br /> DARBY NELSON <br /> Minnesota House of Representatives <br /> MOST ELECTED OFFICIALS recognize the imprudence of This has caused abatement strategies to appear relatively more <br /> continued reliance on landfills as the principle means of solid expensive than they actually are. This in turn fosters a general <br /> , waste disposal, and with good reason. The longterm economic reluctance by many local officials.to embrace a fundamental <br /> consequences of contending with polluted groundwater are enor- shift to substantive abatement strategies to replace the emphasis <br /> mous. on burial. In response to a growing frustration with sluggish <br /> Yet despite the availability of a plethora of alternatives to regional abatement activity at a time when regional landfilling <br /> burying garbage, the landfill emphasis continues. capacity is running low,the 1984 Minnesota legislature passed a <br /> Relative front-end costs understandably strongly influence comprehensive solid waste abatement measure,the Metro Land- <br /> methods of waste disposal chosen by local officials from among fill Abatement Act. Passed as part of an omnibus waste bill, this <br /> the various solid waste disposal strategies. act is an important piece of environmental legislation that should <br /> Unfortunately the tip fee for landfilled waste has never fully significantly reduce the future need for landfill capacity in the <br /> reflected the actual costs <br /> P Y <br /> of burial of garbage to be borne bythe Minneapolis-St.apolis St. Paul area. <br /> public. This hidden public subsidy of landfills,by not appearing Groundwater pollution is one of many costs that don't appear <br /> i on the balance sheets of landfilling, has prevented a valid eco- on the economic balance sheets of landfills. The cost of an alter- <br /> nomic comparison between landfilling and the various abate- native water supply for one suburban community, Lake Elmo, <br /> ment alternatives. affected by the Lake Jane landfill, could reach nearly one mil- <br /> Darby Nelson is a member of the Minnesota House of Representatives lion dollars. This doesn't include monitoring expenses, long <br /> and serves on its Legislative Commission on Waste Management. He term operational costs or the ultimate costs of lawsuits pending <br /> also is vice-Chairman of the House Environment Subcommittee. His against two counties from individuals impacted by pollution at <br /> District includes Anoka-Hennepin and Wright Counties. the Lake Jane site. <br /> July/August 1984 jl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.