Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO TO: Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission <br /> FROM: Staff <br /> 410- DATE: June 25, 1986 <br /> RE: Policy for park land use <br /> Staff met with representatives from the Silver View Park neigh- <br /> borhood on Thursday, June 12, 1986 and discussed the enclosed <br /> policy for park land use . The residents basically concurred with <br /> the policy and felt that it was fair and was responsive to their <br /> respective needs. <br /> From staff ' s perspective , the key issue is the development of a <br /> landscaping plan for each of the neighborhood parks , which will <br /> then dictate the existing and/or future use of the park property. <br /> To that end , I have spoken to City Forester Wriskey and he feels <br /> confident that we can develop formal park planting master plans <br /> for each of the neighborhood parks during the winter months . <br /> Specific suggestions and/or recommendations that we discussed <br /> with the Silver View Park residents regarding planting were to <br /> identify two or three species of large canopy trees that would <br /> serve as the main landscaping material between the pond and resi- <br /> dential lots. We would also utilize some type of a ground cover <br /> or low maintenance planting to help better define the park bound- <br /> ary. The residents felt this could be workable but requested <br /> • review and/or input in the process. Staff assured them that they <br /> would be involved in the process from beginning to end. <br /> One of the other items that was addressed at the meeting was <br /> staff ' s interest in developing the area with reduced maintenance <br /> costs as our number one objective. Their were a number of resi- <br /> dents that expressed a strong interest in purchasing park proper- <br /> ty, which would obviously reduce the maintance budget completely. <br /> Staff ' s position on this issue is that we should not sell park <br /> property unless it is deemed surplus and/or not suitable for <br /> general public use . I feel that if we were to sell some of the <br /> property, which would allow for larger backyards, we would lose <br /> the right to control what types of buildings, facilities and/or_ <br /> encroachments that would develop on that property. I feel that <br /> the one advantage of reduced maintenance costs would not outweigh <br /> the many positive advantages of retaining the park property in <br /> public ownership. <br /> It cannot be stressed enough that Silver View Park , in the next <br /> twenty years, will become the major focal point for public and <br /> recreational uses for Mounds View residents , as additional facil- <br /> ities are developed , and programming of the facility is in- <br /> creased . We must continue to be "futurists" as we develop and <br /> establish policies for our public lands. <br /> 1111 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Park Commission review <br /> the enclosed policy and adopt it in a formal form on. June 27 , <br /> 1986 and to also take a formal position regarding the sale of <br /> park lands. <br /> AKA/sll <br /> Enclosure <br />