My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-30-86 Agenda & Packet
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
01-30-86 Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2024 1:58:11 PM
Creation date
5/15/2023 1:25:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-2- <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS : 41/0 <br /> Rather than endorsing one of the three specific strategies out - <br /> lined by the Task Force Committee, it would be my thoughts that <br /> we would ask for three additional recommendations to be cans ill <br /> ered by the School Board. <br /> Recommendation #1 - We recommend that a minimum of 16 classrool , <br /> spaces be allocated for existing community education program <br /> currently operating within the School District to include generdi <br /> office space, senior citizens center, computer center, aduif <br /> literacy, and early childhood programs. <br /> Recommendation #2 - We recommend that a feasibility study be pre- <br /> pared relating to the concept of establishing a community educa- <br /> tion center within the School District to accomodate the existin.; <br /> 6,000 School District residents per month that attend Community <br /> Education Center programs. <br /> Recommendation #3 - We recommend that the School Board be cogni - <br /> zant and aware of the influence and importance of the 70 - 74 • <br /> percent of the School District households that do not currently; <br /> have children participating in the K-12 program. And , that thf <br /> role of these households is imperative to the success of the K-1 :'. <br /> program and should not be considered as a secondary issue. <br /> It should not be the Community Education Advisory Council 's posi- <br /> tion to adopt strategies, but rather to ensure that existing pro-- <br /> grams and services that are currently being offered are main- <br /> • tained when developing any strataqies for long range School <br /> District uses. <br /> BKA/sll <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.