Laserfiche WebLink
A°UMFT?ON8 <br />In order to proceed tn deveYop and evaluate potential soiution=_ ta the <br />problem_`des ribed''earlier the Suhcommittee fzrst defined as=_umotions <br />and solutian criteria. <br />The assumptions are those it ms thet the Subc mmittee oresupposed ta <br />be true and hence cansidered only potentiel solutions that could be <br />achieued within thei"r 5cope. If, f,r scme reasan, "these assumptians <br />r ..-. , <br />in;"the future are deemed inva:id the list of potent_al sal ttions, anc <br />there=ore recammendetion=_,,may reauir= revisior.. The assumption_ use <br />were: <br />The school'uildinq caoacity'and student enrcl3msnt cfata Frovided <br />by the school district, is tompiete, accurate. and r=rl cts not ony <br />current, but also future, building student capacities and studertt <br />enrallments'(through 1?89-29?O). <br />2. The 1485-1986 staff ratio allocations (and averace c?ass siz=s? <br />wil! rema.n c nstant over the next Tcur year=_. Beea se class si e=_ <br />signi#icanfly affect building capacitizs, this item r=c=ived a <br />significant'amaunt of diecusaio^,'primarily becs=e c= the f_=rge <br />average cla=_s si es that'our district current2y has re2ative te <br />other metropolitart school distritts. In a meeting of the entire <br />l.ong Fange Faci3ities Task Force thi=_ item io s d=scus=_ed and es a <br />result o4 a close vete taken at tha*_ m ting the suh cmmittees r ere <br />direc=ed to use the IS85-1?B6 staff ratic allocaticns. <br />distric*_ th'i <br />inding will''remain corisistent with`that availat:e <br />ojected, as af Novem6er 1995, uy'th: schoci <br />uture y ars. C rtainiy severali'pc ential' <br />ivailabie if adeitional or unlimited funds ea:^e <br />e=ause of the =undir.a scenerio of'our dfst:^ict in " <br />esrs, and becausz ef unc=rtaint:as oi stats <br />ure, it was cansi ered prudent and respensible t <br />icnsithat fit within cur current fsndird o tleek. <br />if funds that da nat e:c-ist were assumed, it was <br />we wouid run a significant ri_5k o f defining_a <br />not'be imple nentabl= or would res lt in severa2 <br />icant changes from year to year, le± alone I.ck <br />tance. 6iven the n ed for stabi2i v within the <br />nut done. <br />14-