Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Supporters were moreshighly concentrated among : <br /> * Less than two year residents <br /> * Planning to stay less than two years <br /> * Renters <br /> * 18-34 year olds <br /> * Professional /Technical households <br /> * $20,000-$30,000 yearly income households <br /> * Precinct 3 residents <br /> Adamant opposition occurred among : <br /> * 11-20 year residents <br /> * 45-54 year olds <br /> The undecided element of the community: <br /> * Over twenty year residents <br /> * 55-64 year olds <br /> * Retirees <br /> The passage of this bond referendum would require a very <br /> aggressive campaign. Voter identification, and get-out-the-vote <br /> activities would be required . To further insure passage, some <br /> P <br /> rovisions for elderlyresidents would need to be included in the <br /> • <br /> package. Although not impossible to pass, a successful contest <br /> would result only from a well-organized campaign effort . <br /> PrinciRal Source of Recreational Information: <br /> Residents were asked : <br /> What is your principal source of <br /> information about City recreational <br /> programs and opportunities? <br /> The major source of information proved to be the city newsletter : <br /> NONE BY <br /> PEOPLE 7% <br /> NEWSLETTER 48% <br /> BULLETIN 11% <br /> FLYERS 8% <br /> PAPERS 18%. <br /> OTHER 1'/ <br /> 111 ) The most effective communications effort would include newspaper <br /> inserts together with the city newsletter . <br /> 78 <br />