Laserfiche WebLink
* Over 30 year residents <br /> * Over 55 year olds <br /> * Retirees <br /> * $10,000-$20,000 yearly income households <br /> As long as the project would require no tax increase to fund <br /> development of the course, the size of the audience in Mounds <br /> View suggests that the undertaking would prove viable. <br /> Wetlands Preservation: <br /> The disposition of the wetlands in Mounds View was discussed <br /> through the query: <br /> Should the city attempt to preserve <br /> wetlands in Mounds View or should it <br /> encourage development on those lands? <br /> A solid majority favored preserving the areas: <br /> PRESERVE '70% <br /> ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT 12V. <br /> !• BOTH (VOL) 10%DON'T KNOW/REFUSED 9/ <br /> Higher support for preservation was found among : <br /> * Planning to stay for at least ten years <br /> * Owner/Manager households <br /> * Over $50,000 yearly income households <br /> * Dual income households <br /> { Development was selected more frequently by: <br /> * Planning to stay 6-10 years <br /> A balanced approach was the choice of 21-30 year residents. <br /> Of course, to preserve the wetlands would require the City <br /> of Mounds View acquiring them. To investigate if sentiment <br /> changed when a tax increase to pay for the acquisitions was <br /> factored in, respondents favoring preservation were asked : <br /> Would you favor or oppose a property <br /> tax increase to permit the city to <br /> purchase the wetlands for preservation? <br /> 80 <br />