Laserfiche WebLink
Item 6: Traffic, Speed, Enforcement <br />Included in the packet are all the items council received for their January 2022 workshop which resulted <br />in the "experiment" to install two addition signs on Groveland which was completed later that year; one <br />at Groveland Circle, and one at Sherwood. There is an existing sign at Ardan. <br />Staff (PD) collected a limited amount of data on Groveland, Spring Lake Road, Long Lake Road, and Red <br />Oak prior to the installations. <br />Staff (PD) has been collecting data for same the past two months along with data from H2 as we receive <br />complaints from residents along that corridor. NOTE - This is not engineering quality level data, that <br />would entail spending thousands of dollars to obtain. However, since it is the same equipment, an <br />argument can be made that it is comparable data. <br />Significant variables exist including construction of SLP road. Less significant is Groveland Village as no <br />data is available on occupancy of units and thus the potential volume impact. <br />Since the installation, staff has received requests from residents to remove the stop signs, they are <br />annoyed and do not feel they work. Staff has also received three requests for additional signs, <br />Groveland south of MV Boulevard, Spring Lake Road north of the Boulevard, and one on H2. Council <br />received a request for similar signs on County I and SLP Road, which were installed. <br />Since the experiment began, the Legislature has passed language that was signed into law allowing <br />every city/political subdivision to establish their own limits. Minneapolis and all adjacent communities <br />to the north (staff did not survey in other directions) have lowered their limits to 25 MPH. <br />Ramsey County has notified staff they will be lowering the limit on all their roads that have a marked <br />bicycle trail. Thus, portions of Long Lake Road will go to 25. <br />Staff has also advised and will update council that the City has not experienced a serious injury or <br />fatality on any city streets. Those have been confined to County and State Roads. <br />Included in the packet is a spreadsheet detailing 6 full years and current year to date data, of all calls for <br />service, DWI arrests, and traffic citations. <br />Policy issues for council to consider and contemplate include; PD staffing, calls for service, actual versus <br />perceived threat, violation of MSA standards, and cost of signage (speed limit and stop signs). <br />We are currently down three officers, calls for service measure between 10,000 and 11,000. However, <br />decline is a direct function of being down officers as traffic stops result in a call for service. Less officers, <br />less interactions, fewer calls. Actual versus perceived relates to no fatalities or serious injuries versus <br />comments "someone is going to die", violation of MSA is specific to traffic control signs that do not meet <br />MNDOT engineering standards which none of the additional signs meet. If advised by MNDOT to <br />remove, council has choice of removing or foregoing (and paying back) the MSA funds. Cost of sign <br />relates to speed limit, and or traffic control. The flashing stop signs, utilized to ensure motorist who <br />would not normally be expecting a stop sign, are alerted to the new stop sign requirements. <br />