My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2023/07/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Agenda Packets - 2023/07/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:48 PM
Creation date
7/6/2023 9:38:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/5/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
7/5/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would be more time for the deputy clerk t❑ focus on data practices and <br />licensing work. Martens stated that there is not an assistant position in <br />administration, and there is no capacity to add one. The deputy clerk fills that <br />role. <br />Myrland asked if turning elections over to the county has been successful <br />with other cities. Eisenbeisz stated that the response is very positive because <br />time is freed for regular work and special projects, and there is no liability. <br />Martens noted that there are added costs if there are election recounts. <br />Myrland asked how elections are funded. Martens answered that elections <br />are budgeted in the general fund. <br />CounciImember Johnson arrived at the meeting at this time. <br />Mayor Denkinger asked staff to get information about the trend of county <br />election costs and whether they have remained consistent. She does not like <br />the idea of paying in off years. It would be reassuring if the costs were static <br />year to year. However, because of limited staff and the goals of the city, she <br />would lean toward contracting with Ramsey County. <br />It was the consensus of the council for staff to bring the issue to a council <br />meeting for a vote. <br />PARK BUILDING ❑ESIGN CONCEPTS <br />Presentation by Parks and Recreation Director Steve Benoit <br />There are two locations identified to explore possible park building designs: <br />Shoreview Commons and Bobby Theisen Park. Phase 2 of Shoreview <br />Commons had a plan for a building with restrooms but was not built because <br />of cost overruns. The oldest park building is at Bobby Theisen and is in most <br />need of repair. Also, there are plans to expand pickleball courts at Bobby <br />Theisen. Currently, there is $4 million in the CIP for park buildings. The city <br />has been working with LHB on the design of buildings. <br />Commons: Three designs are presented: <br />A. Building would be to the east of the playground with the maximum <br />number of amenities, including a meeting room, a concession stand, <br />restrooms, open air walkthrough to the playground. It could be rented for <br />birthday parties with capacity for up to eight tables. Storage is included. It <br />would rent well based on calls received. The question is whether such a <br />building is needed next to the community center with rental space. <br />Estimated cost is $2.8 million. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.