Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members <br />July 21, 2023 <br />Page 3 <br />The Legislature could have chosen to provide that local sales tax could be approved at the local unit of <br />government's general election, but choose not to do so. <br />November 7, 2023 is the date of the school district for the Mounds View Public School District and is a <br />"general election" for the public officials elected to the Mounds View Public School District. If all City <br />of Mounds View voters are also included in the Mounds View School District elections, then November <br />7, 2023 is a "general election" date for all voters in the City of Mounds View. <br />The legislative intent of Minn. Stat. 297.99 is unclear. The Legislature could have required an election <br />approving a local sales tax only be held at the same time the City's general election is held, but did not <br />do so. The Legislature could have provided additional guidance clarifying that in addition to the City's <br />general election another eligible election is any general election in an event numbered year, but chose <br />not to do so.5 <br />One argument made in favor of only allowing local sales tax to be confirmed at a City's general election <br />or an even -year general election is the difference in voter turnout. However, if maximum voter turnout <br />were truly the reason for not allowing a city to approve a local sales tax at an odd -year election at which <br />no city general election occurs then the Legislature should have only allowed even -year elections since <br />voter turnout is generally high in even -numbered years regardless of whether a city election is held. <br />However, if voter turnout is an issue considered when interpreting the statute or legislative intent, the <br />City's argument is strengthened because the city is already holding a special election on November 7, <br />2023, to fill the open vacancy left in the Mayor's seat. <br />IV. Risk <br />If the City moves forward with an election in 2023 it could be challenged. While we believe that the <br />interpretation discussed above is reasonable, the lack of clarity in the statute means that there remains a <br />risk that a court will not agree. We were unable to locate any caselaw addressing this topic. <br />Additionally, a couple of potential outcomes include: <br />1) Referendum is unsuccessful. <br />2) Referendum is successful but is challenged. <br />a. City election is upheld. <br />b. City election is voided. <br />i. City must bring the approval back at the 2024 election. <br />ii. City must re -obtain approval from the legislature. The Legislature has a current <br />moratorium on issuing new sales tax legislation for two years. <br />V. Process6 <br />MMinnesota Statutes, section 205.10 & Minnesota Statutes, section 205.16 <br />MU210\315\886618.v5 <br />