My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2023/10/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Agenda Packets - 2023/10/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:19 PM
Creation date
10/11/2023 1:25:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/2/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
10/2/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Who is speeding: <br />Studies show that just over half of the US population speeds with male’s and young drivers comprising <br />the majority of those numbers. <br /> <br /> <br />Options/Ideas to Consider: <br />Traffic/Camera Enforcement – Work with legislators to legalize this (once legal, fiscal impact to <br />implement) <br /> <br />Police Enforcement – Can and will continue but widespread problem coupled with limited resources <br />results in modest impact. <br /> <br />Installation of Stop signs – Data suggest that stop signs work, however, they do not meet MSA standards <br />and could result in DOT requiring them to be removed. Secondary issue is they may just push the traffic <br />to another street. Fiscal impact of $400 for standard and $1,800 for flashing (includes installation). <br />Added challenge of where to place (not all residents are in support) <br /> <br />Speed Bumps – Tried in the past and resulted in more complaints. Also present significant complications <br />for plow operations. <br /> <br />Use of non-sworn officers to enforce – Impractical and potentially highly risky given the uncertainty of <br />unknown occupants, possibility of guns, contraband, and other unknowns. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />PREVIOUS MEMO <br />Traffic, Speed, Enforcement <br />Included in packet are all the items council received for their January 2022 workshop which resulted in <br />the “experiment” to install two addition signs on Groveland which was completed later that year; one at <br />Groveland Circle, and one at Sherwood. There is an existing sign at Ardan. <br /> <br />Staff (PD) collected a limited amount of data on Groveland, Spring Lake Road, Long Lake Road, and Red <br />Oak prior to the installations. <br /> <br />Staff (PD) has been collecting data for same the past two months along with data from H2 as we receive <br />complaints from residents along that corridor. NOTE - This is not engineering quality level data, that <br />would entail spending thousands of dollars to obtain. However, since it is the same equipment, an <br />argument can be made that it is comparable data. <br /> <br />Significant variables exist including construction of SLP road. Less significant is Groveland Village as no <br />data is available on occupancy of units and thus the potential volume impact. <br /> <br />Since the installation, staff has received requests from residents to remove the stop signs, they are <br />annoyed and do not feel they work. Staff has also received three requests for additional signs,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.