My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2024/05/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
Agenda Packets - 2024/05/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:49 PM
Creation date
5/29/2024 9:45:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/6/2024
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
5/6/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Item 03 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />The Mounds View Vision <br />A Thriving Desirable Community <br />Street Improvement Fund <br />• The current property tax levy is $150,000. Based on potential projects, this amount should <br />be increased. <br />• We continue to have sufficient projects to utilize our MSA street construction aid each year. <br />It is projected that the projects in the plan will exceed the funding available and we will be <br />drawing into future years to cover our costs. The City may want to explore an MSA advance. <br />• Staff is proposing to direct a portion of the LGA funds the city receives to this capital fund. <br />LGA has been unalloted in the past and staff would recommend trying to reduce reliance on <br />these funds for general operations and instead, direct them more toward capital projects. <br />• There is a definite need to stay on top of street improvement projects to ensure streets reach <br />their useful lives and don’t require costly premature full reconstructions. <br /> <br />Utility Funds <br />• For all three utility funds, we are assuming a 4.5% increase in user charges and a 3.0% <br />inflationary increase in costs each of the 10 years. <br />• Water Fund – requires a much larger user charge increase than the 4.5% being assumed. <br />• Sewer Fund – no I&I grant funds have been included in the plan as the amounts are <br />unpredictable. <br />• Surface Water Fund – the plan is assuming a 50% grant fund match for each of the future <br />major dredging projects. Without grant funds, the City will need to postpone projects or <br />increase user charges. <br /> <br />Vehicle & Equipment Replacement Fund <br />• Based on information received from the various departments, this fund is able to cover the <br />costs of the vehicles and equipment anticipated to be replaced over the next 10 years. <br />• The breakdown of transfers into this fund ($470,000) to cover the costs is as follows: <br />General Fund $280,000 <br />Water Fund $ 90,000 <br />Sewer Fund $ 60,000 <br />Surface Water Fund $ 40,000 <br /> <br />Conclusion <br />Staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding the following items: <br /> <br />2025 projects <br />As we review the 2025 projects, does the Council have any questions, comments or <br />concerns about including them during budget preparation? <br /> <br />2025 property tax levy/transfers in <br />The levies/transfers currently being proposed for 2025 are: Vehicle/Equipment Replacement <br />($280,000); Special Projects ($75,000); and Street Improvement ($150,000). Levy/transfer <br />increases are needed for the Special Projects and Street Improvement funds. What increases, <br />if any, should staff assume? <br /> <br />2025 Local Government Aid (LGA) <br />There was a significant increase in local government aid funding for 2024. 90% of this funding is <br />being included in the General Fund. LGA has been unalloted in the past and staff would <br />recommend trying to reduce reliance on these funds for general operations and instead, direct <br />them more toward capital projects. The previously unbudgeted 10% is being included in the <br />Street Improvement Fund with the hope that this amount can increase with future budgets. Does <br />the Council have a preference on where the funds should go?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.