My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2024/06/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
Agenda Packets - 2024/06/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:27 PM
Creation date
6/11/2024 1:34:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/10/2024
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
6/10/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 28, 2024 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />1 Troy Olson, North Metro Mayors, provided the Council with a wrap up on the recently completed <br />2 legislative session. He explained North Metro Mayors was an organization that was made up of 15 <br />3 communities in the North Metro that collaborates on issues of importance, such as infrastructure, <br />4 to the region. He thanked Mounds View for being a part of the coalition. He commented on how <br />5 important it was to have a collective voice on infrastructure issues. He discussed how the session <br />6 ended noting there was not enough support to pass the bonding bill, which was disappointing to <br />7 the region. <br />9 Mayor Lindstrom asked what happened with the ERA bill. Mr. Olson reported a vote was not <br />10 taken in the Senate on this bill. <br />12 City Administrator Zikmund inquired if the legislature would be holding a special session. Mr. <br />13 Olson did not believe a special session would be held. <br />14 <br />15 Acting Mayor Meehlhause questioned if the North Metro had any victories for the region. Mr. <br />16 Olson stated the bill regarding local control and affordable housing did not move forward, which <br />17 was considered a victory for the region. <br />18 <br />19 Acting Mayor Meehlhause asked if there were any cities that received local sales tax authorization <br />20 and had a bonding request. Mr. Olson explained he was uncertain but noted there was a lot of <br />21 conversation around how the State was to consider local sales tax requests without coming to the <br />22 legislature. <br />23 <br />24 Mayor Lindstrom requested further information on what community the affordable housing bill <br />25 was aimed at. Mr. Olson indicated the advocates cast their net pretty wide, noting they were <br />26 looking at Minneapolis and growing suburbs, more than outstate Minnesota. <br />27 <br />28 Mayor Lindstrom commented on how this change would incentivize developers to purchase <br />29 normal single family homes to be redeveloped into small, unaffordable rental units. He anticipated <br />30 this bill would continue to drive the price of housing up and would not be equitable for those with <br />31 lower income. <br />32 <br />33 City Administrator Zikmund explained the City belongs to three professional organizations, North <br />34 Metro Mayors, Metro Cities and the League of Minnesota Cities. He commented further on the <br />35 focus for each of these organizations. He stated the North Metro Mayors was a unique organization <br />36 that worked effectively to collaborate for the region as a formidable force within the legislature. <br />37 <br />38 Council Member Gunn requested further information on the Blue Line. Mr. Olson reported the <br />39 Met Council would have oversight on the Southwest Line (Green Line). He indicated the Blue <br />40 Line continues to move forward and funding was allocated for those who have been displaced for <br />41 the line. He stated this line would run from Minneapolis through Robbinsdale and up into Brooklyn <br />42 Park. <br />43 <br />44 Sharon Kirscher, 8406 Red Oak Drive, questioned how the public transportation lines would be <br />45 supported given the fact more and more people were now working from home and did not rely on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.