Laserfiche WebLink
Krueger asked about the YMCA Contract; Dazenski had copies and <br />passed them out to the committee members. (Roepke also passed out a <br />tally sheet regarding the park fields and useage.) <br />New Business: <br />4a) Item 4 - YMCA Programming <br />Coughlin asked Miller and Hansen how the budget looked at this time. <br />Miller stated that the community center was budgeted as a group. 2002 <br />budget will reflect the costs isolated for particular programs, ie: YMCA; <br />unfortunately there is still some question as to what costs are associated <br />with the YMCA. Ie News letter costs. Miller further stated that the <br />Finance Director is reviewing the current costs or at least to the best of his <br />ability, relating to the YMCA. <br />Hansen stated that the yearly payment to the YMCA is a flat rate of <br />$157,000.00, with inflation factors, which in the year 2001 would bring <br />the total payment at $165,000.00. Payments will also be made for special <br />programming including ice skating and playgroiuid supervision and <br />middle school and program leadership and this will bring the total paid to <br />the YMCA at approximately $200,000.00 for the year 2001. Hansen stated <br />that he is looking for the report from the YMCA, reflecting the registration <br />fees for the recreation programs. Hansen also stated that the operation <br />costs for the YMCA have been recorded in the General Fund of the <br />recreation programs and some have been recorded in the Community <br />Center Fund. (Also included in the Community Center Fund are the <br />operating costs for the Community Center.) Since 1999, sufficient <br />attention was not made as to the break down of the costs. As of today, the <br />practice has been changed to separate the invoices/bills to reflect the <br />proper accounts and the budget for 2002 will be reflective of this <br />procedure. Unfortunately, they cannot sort out the actual breakdowns. <br />Miller stated that documentation is lacking to provide accurate figures but <br />2002 will be better. <br />Szepanski asked what the costs would be to having an in-house Park and <br />Recreation Department as opposed to contracting it out? Are there any <br />numbers available? <br />Miller suggested that instead of going backwards in the past, that the <br />committee look at the program the City has now and then look at what is <br />lilted and not liked with this program. Then costs could be looked at for <br />creating a program that reflects what everyone would like to see and see if <br />it would be cost effective. <br />Long replied fair enough. <br />Coughlin stated that he was adding the costs up in the contract now, and <br />there is roughly $190,000.00 earmarked for building maintenance. <br />