My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2024/08/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
Agenda Packets - 2024/08/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:32 PM
Creation date
8/12/2024 1:23:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/12/2024
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
8/12/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 22, 2024 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> 1 this matter and has yet to receive a call back. He discussed how the barriers were three and a half <br /> 2 feet tall and the weeds were now taller than the barriers, because he could not mow the area. He <br /> 3 shared before and after pictures of the area he was concerned about. He explained he was told the <br /> 4 barriers would be removed by the end of June and noted the barriers have not been removed. He <br /> 5 requested the City get the barriers removed so he has access to his property. He recommended <br /> 6 signs be posted on the trail that states no motorized vehicles allowed. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Noelle Barrigan, 7765 Spring Lake Road, explained the plastic barriers were not visible in the <br /> 9 picture because the weeds are so high. She reported she has a riding lawn mower and noted this <br /> 10 area could not be mowed because the area has been changed so drastically. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Dr. Jean Strait, 7728 Knollwood Drive, reviewed several before and after photographs with the <br /> 13 Council. She explained the area was now extremely overgrown and the area was not properly <br /> 14 graded. She requested staff follow up with the contractor to ensure the barriers are removed, the <br /> 15 invasive weeds are removed and that the area was properly graded to ensure her neighbors have <br /> 16 proper access to the water. She recommended the Council complete a property impact study before <br /> 17 projects are started in order to better understand how homeowners will be impacted. She asked <br /> 18 that the Council begin considering what solutions can be pursued in order to address the mistakes <br /> 19 that were made in the project <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Ms. Barrigan stated a year has passed and nothing has been done to her property. She explained <br /> 22 she has spoken to an attorney and an appraiser. She commented on how difficult it would be for <br /> 23 her to sell her property as lakeshore property because the property has been destroyed. She <br /> 24 indicated this has become a detriment to her and her husband and noted they still pay taxes as a <br /> 25 lakeshore property. She commented on how someone helped themselves to their boat, noting <br /> 26 because she could no longer see the shoreline because of the tall weeds. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Mr. Barrigan anticipated his property value went down at least $10,000 due to the street project. <br /> 29 <br /> 3o 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> 31 A. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 1014, Adding a New Chapter 38 <br /> 32 to Title II of Mounds View City Code Regarding Discriminatory Covenants— <br /> 33 ROLL CALL VOTE. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Assistant City Administrator Beeman requested the Council adopt an Ordinance adding a new <br /> 36 Chapter 38 to Title II of Mounds View City Code regarding Discriminatory Covenants. He <br /> 37 explained the City Council held the first reading for this Ordinance on July 8. He reported this <br /> 38 Ordinance would ensure all racial covenants were discharged prior to the point of sale of any home <br /> 39 in Mounds View. Staff commented further on the Ordinance and recommended approval. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Mayor Lindstrom opened the meeting for public comment. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 A member of the public asked if there would be any fine for not discharging racial covenants. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Mayor Lindstrom explained an administrative penalty would be charged to residents that do not <br /> 46 have their racial covenants discharged before point of sale. He anticipated that most residents in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.