My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2021/07/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
Agenda Packets - 2021/07/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2025 2:51:22 PM
Creation date
2/25/2025 2:10:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/6/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In such instances, traditional open -water water quality treatment basins can be supplanted by an <br />extended detention basin which has a significantly different outlet structure than a normal wet <br />detention basin outlet. And, in instances where it is desired to further improve on an existing basin's <br />treatment efficiency, the basin's outlet structure can be modified or fitted with an extended detention <br />basin -type outlet structure. Such a structure tnodifrcation would detain flows from a 1-year to 2-year <br />storm event for up to 24 hours. With the vast amount of sediment and pollutants that enter a pond <br />coming from storms of that magnitude, if flows from those storms can be held in the basin over a <br />longer period of time, significantly improved water quality treatment can be achieved. <br />in the case of the city's current water quality treatment ponds. there may be reason and opportunity <br />to retrofit certain basin outlet structures with a new extended detention basin -type structure. Such a <br />structure modification is recommended for Silver View Pond. Following are a few situations where <br />the city may want to analyze performing such modifications: <br />1. Where an existing basin is also a historic wetland and where excavation of the sediments may <br />prove to be very costly, because wetland replacement will be required by the local <br />governmental unit (LGU) that administers the Wetland Conservation Act. In this case, the <br />city may be able to forego or significantly delay the point in time where excavation is needed <br />by simply retrofitting, the pond's existing outlet structure with an extended detention basin - <br />type structure. <br />2. Where a basins inlet(s) and outlet are in close proximity, which enables inflows to short- <br />circuit and not use the full extent of the basin. In this case, the extended detention structure <br />can force waters to be detained long enough to utilize the full treatment capacity of the basin, <br />3. When higher treatment efficiencies are required due to regulations, MS4 permits, or Total <br />Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements. <br />4. When the city decides on its own to provide even better treatment than its current pond is <br />providing,. This may he based on monitoring results or other decision factors. <br />The cost for adding an extended detention nutlet structure to Silver View Pond is included in Table 1. <br />Because extended detention basins and their structures are less well-known, the following paragraphs <br />are intended to provide the reader of this document a better understanding of how such facilities <br />function. <br />I' MpI-23 MN 62 'iW SiIker Vie" fond Assessment Workriks keporl NiIVcI Vie" I'nnri Aisevinnent !innI,daca 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.