My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2021/07/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
Agenda Packets - 2021/07/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2025 2:51:22 PM
Creation date
2/25/2025 2:10:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/6/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Extended Detention Basins and Their Structures: <br />Extended detention basins function similarly to wet detention basins, except they perform their <br />treatment without much (if any) open water (dead storage). They are designed to force water to pool <br />long enough for the majority of pollutants to settle out by the normal settling processes. This forced <br />detention is accomplished through the construction of specially designed, multi -tiered outlet <br />structures. The following describes the design considerations and design parameters for extended <br />detention basins. <br />Extended Detention Basin Design Considerations: <br />There are four key considerations for extended detention basin design: <br />1. The primary removal process for most water quality treatment basins is particulate settling. <br />The longer water is held (or detained) in a basin, the more likely pollutant particles are to <br />settle out, hence, the term extended detention. The EPA"s National Urban Runoff Program <br />(NURP) documents indicate that there may be diminishing returns on particulate removal for <br />detention times beyond 24 hours. <br />2. From numerous case studies, the vast majority of the mass -volume of pollutants carried by <br />runoff occurs during; storms of 1-year or 2-year magnitude or less. For much of Minnesota, <br />a 2.5-inch rainfall in 24 hours is considered to be a 1-year storm event. <br />3. Further, as published in the EPA's NURP documents, the average time between storm peaks <br />in Minnesota is about 87 hours, or a little more than 3 days. If flows are to be detained in a <br />basin, the basin typically must be dewatered in no more than 2 days to enable the basin to be <br />ready for the next storm. <br />4. The NURP documents reveal that the surficial size of a basin (the wetted area for the water <br />quality treatment portion of a basin) is important to the basin's treatment efficiency. In <br />general, the bigger the surface area the better. But there are diminishing returns on basins <br />with wetted surface areas that are larger than Y2% to 1 % of the total untreated tributary area <br />of the basin. <br />Extended Detention Basin Design Parameters: <br />Based on the key considerations described above, the following are the key design parameters for <br />extended detention basins and their structures: <br />r- h7lsis 23 MN fi' 2362I0fi2 Suter Vitw Bond Assessinrnl Wnrkf'iies Reporl Silver View Pond Assrssmcnl-final.doe% 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.