Laserfiche WebLink
~unds View City Council <br />gular Meeting <br />July 22, 1991 <br />Page Three <br />Mayor Linke's response was that Mr. Glisan never came in to the City to <br />discuss it with them or let the Council know there was a problem. <br />Mr. Glisan stated that in 1985 as part of a subdivision the City asked him <br />to place drain tiles in from Long Lake Road back. Mr. Glisan stated that <br />he did this work at no charge to the City. <br />Mayor Linke did not recall this matter and advised Mr. Glisan that he would <br />look into it. <br />Mr. Glisan asked that Mayor Linke look at the minutes and get back to him <br />so this matter could be settled. <br />CONSENT AGENDA <br />Samantha Orduno, City Administrator read the Consent Agenda. Mayor Linke <br />asked the Councilmembers if there were any items they desired to have <br />removed. <br />• MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to adopt the Consent <br />Agenda as presented. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion Carried <br />COUNCIL BUSINESS: <br />9.1 Samantha Orduno, City Administrator reviewed Staff Report No. 91- <br />51C Regarding City Participation in the Oakgrove Landfill <br />"Potentially Responsible Party" Group. <br />The Oakgrove Landfill has been listed as a Superfund site by the <br />EPA. The City of Mounds View was asked to respond to a list of <br />questions regarding the possible transportation of materials to <br />the Landfill by the City during the time the site was <br />operational. <br />The matter .was referred to Mark Barney, City Attorney, who <br />responded that the City of Mounds View, to the best of its <br />knowledge, had not transported any hazardous materials to the <br />Landfill. <br />Several weeks ago, Mr. Barney was informed of a group of cities, <br />businesses and other entities which had been named by the EPA as <br />"Potentially Responsible Parties" (PRPs) to the contamination of <br />the Oakgrove Landfill. These PRPs have formed in reaction to <br />being named as "Transporters" to the Landfill and informed by the <br />. EPA that unless they agree to clean up the site themselves, the <br />EPA will clean it up and sue them for three times the cost of the <br />clean up. <br />