My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1992/09/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Minutes - 1992/09/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2025 2:10:49 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 3:12:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/14/1992
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Eight <br />~gular Meeting September 14, 1992 <br />Mayor Linke stated that setting the hearing date on the 8th <br />would not have given ample time. Mayor Linke stated that he would <br />not have felt comfortable putting something on the tax roles without <br />public input and then setting the dollar amount later which could be <br />from one cent to one hundred dollars. <br />Councilmember Rickaby stated this cost would not be put on the tax <br />roles without an informational meeting. The City has found ways to <br />post these notices in the past and Councilmember Rickaby stated that <br />in her opinion it could've been done. <br />Orduno stated that the notice has to be posted and published 10 <br />days before the public hearing is held. <br />Councilmember Rickaby stated again that is why she brought this <br />item to the Council's attention on September 2. There would not <br />have been a timeline problem and there was plenty of time to set <br />up an informational meeting. This item did not need a public <br />hearing. <br />Mayor Linke stated that if they would have set up an informational <br />meeting on the 2nd the Council :would not have heard the presentation <br />by the EQTF because it was not 'presented until September 8. In order <br />to set a public hearing the Council would have had to call to order on] <br />September 2. <br />Councilmember Rickaby stated that she brought it up on the 2nd so <br />that the Council would know by the 8th to schedule an informational <br />meeting. A formal public hearing is not necessary. <br />Mayor Linke stated that, in his opinion, the people of the community <br />deserve the right to be heard at a public hearing. <br />Richard Oman stated that the Environmental Quality Task Force held <br />a meeting on September 1. The Task Force was ready to do the <br />presentation on the 2nd. There is no pressure on the Council or the. <br />residents to make a decision immediately. There would be no problem. <br />with waiting two to three weeks. <br />VOTE: 1 aye 4 nays Motion Failed <br />Councilmember Rickaby moved the same motion stand except collect <br />the fees through the City's utility billing process. <br />This motion was seconded by Mayor Linke. <br />Councilmember Quick asked if this item were tabled, was the only dead- <br />line the negotiations with a single hauler. <br />• Asleson reaffirmed that this was true. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.