Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Council Member Mueller did not feel it would be reasonable for the second driveway to be connected to the first/primary driveway. The concrete in the rear yard was onsite prior to the <br /> current homeowners’ ownership of the property. For this reason, she approved of the second curb cut. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney questioned if a variance had been applied for by the homeowner to allow for the rear yard to be used as a driveway. Mr. Collins explained he was unaware that <br /> this was necessary as the concrete work was completed prior to him purchasing the home. He expressed concern with the term non-conforming curb cut as he did not create this situation. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty stated ordinarily he would not go against Staff’s recommendation. However, with the concrete driveway in the rear yard preexisting, he could then support the second curb <br /> cut. He suggested that a time period specified to ensure that a connection would be made between the concrete and the curb cut. Planning Associate Heller commented the homeowner would <br /> have one year to complete the work. <br /> <br />Mr. Collins stated he was planning to complete the work as soon as the new apron was complete. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney objected to the second curb cut as he had to follow City Code on this issue. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br /> <br />8. CONSENT AGENDA <br /> <br />Resolution 7960, a Resolution Approving Business Licenses for the Period of July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013. <br /> <br />Council Member Mueller stated the former PAC building has a new tenant. She questioned if this new tenant required a business license. Assistant City Administrator Crane indicated <br /> the new business did not require a business license. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Approve the Consent Agenda as presented. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS <br /> <br />Finance Director Beer answered the Council's questions related to claims. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Approve the Just and Correct Claims as presented. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES