Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br />• scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on Wednesday, March 15, however, the <br />Commission was concerned that their recommendation of approval of the six billboards on the <br />golf course not hamper Sysco from achieving the two billboards they are requesting on their <br />property. He indicated this was matter was discussed with Golf Course Superintendent, John <br />Hammerschmidt, in terms of a possible shift in the spacing to provide for the 1,000 foot <br />separation. He stated that after researching this matter, Superintendent Hammerschmidt advised <br />that the spacing of the signs and their proposed locations were relative to the physical features on <br />the golf course. He indicated that if the signs were shifted to allow for the two signs on the <br />Sysco property, and maintaining the 1,000-foot separation, one of the billboards would be <br />situated in the eighth green, which would not be feasible. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the Planning Commission has recommended to the City <br />Council that the two parties work together to determine a solution. He indicated both <br />Superintendent Hammerschmidt and the representative of Delite Sign Company were agreeable <br />to this, and both felt that this matter could be resolved. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated on March 1, the Planning Commission recommended to the <br />City Council that the request for the Interim Use Permit be approved. He explained that this <br />recommendation was also based in part on Ordinance 644, which requires that the adverse effects <br />criteria be considered with regard to the billboards. He advised that this pertains to how the use <br />impacts the relationship to the Municipal Comprehensive Plan, the geographical area involved, <br />the character of the surrounding area, and whether such use will tend to depreciate the area. He <br />indicated the Planning Commission, in reviewing these items, felt that the installation of the <br />billboards on the golf course property would not have an adverse impact upon the golf course <br />itself, or upon neighboring properties. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the Planning Commission also reviewed the general <br />conditional use permit criteria, which must also be examined pursuant to Ordinance 644. He <br />explained that although this is an Interim Use Permit, the Ordinance indicates that this use be <br />reviewed in the same manner and context as a conditional use. He advised that the Planning <br />Commission considered the eight separate criteria that are presented in the City Code for <br />conditional uses, and felt that the proposal, as presented by Eller Media complied with these <br />conditions, and were consistent with the City Code. He stated that in light of this, and the <br />willingness of both parties to work together on their separate applications, the Planning <br />Commission recommended approval of the Interim Use Permit. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has drafted Resolution 5419, which approves the Interim <br />Use Permit for six billboards to be constructed on the Bridges Golf Course property, with <br />stipulations. He indicated the first stipulation indicates that the billboards shall be designed and <br />constructed as indicated within the Eller Media proposal, dated January 14, 2000. He pointed out <br />that if the Council desires to dictate that all six billboards be constructed of exactly the same <br />materials, such language should be added at this time, as this is not specifically stated in the <br />resolution. <br />• <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the second stipulation indicates that the locations of the <br />proposed billboards are to be as indicated on Page 8 of Eller Media's proposal. He stated the last <br />