Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Apri124, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 19 <br />Council Member Stigney stated he would agree, in as much as DeLite could do this. He stated he <br />would prefer these billboards be identical to those at the golf course. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated he was not attempting to throw additional hoops in front of the applicant, <br />or to drag this matter out any further. He explained that no member of the Council or Planning <br />Commission was in favor of billboards, therefore, they must attempt to find a balance, in that if <br />they are going to have billboards, at least from the City's standpoint, in order to address some of <br />the golf course bond issues, they are as aesthetically pleasing and acceptable to the landscape as <br />possible. He indicated everyone is in agreement that the three-legged design is possible at the <br />site, therefore, he would rather take the extra step and proceed with this design style. He <br />indicated the light pole appeared to be an option, and perhaps it could simply be a unique feature <br />of the Bridges Golf Course, to differentiate between the City's billboards and Sysco's billboards. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he desired to see a reasonable design along this stretch of <br />roadway, adding that if they are going to live with the billboards for the next 15 years, they <br />should attempt to make them as compatible as possible. He pointed out that if this represents an <br />additional cost, this is not his criteria to evaluate, but rather that of the bidder who installs them. <br />He stated his first preference is to make the billboard designs as similar as possible, and his <br />second preference would be to make the base compatible. He indicated he had no strong leaning <br />in either direction.. <br />City Attorney Long stated with regard to the friendly amendment that was currently on the table, <br />the Council might wish to have this reflected m the resolution. He explained that there were two <br />issues, one of which was related to the actual design, which should be specified in Exhibit B. He <br />stated the second issue relates to the specific language of the resolution. He indicated he had <br />taken the liberty to draft language relating to the criteria in an attempt to capture the intent, and <br />would suggest that this be included in Item 2 of the resolution to indicate "The design of the <br />proposed billboards shall not include a monopole design, and shall include the same decorative <br />monument style stone or brick face design appearance as the billboards approved for the Bridges <br />Golf Course in a form substantially similar to that attached as Exhibit B." <br />Mayor Coughlin stated he would submit this as his friendly amendment, and would stipulate <br />Option 1 on Exhibit B. <br />City Attorney Long advised that because this is an interim use permit, the Council may attach <br />conditions, however, the applicant must agree to these conditions. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated all parties were present, and he would hope that this issue could be <br />resolved at this time. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if the applicant would be responsible for removing the <br />billboards on the Sysco property after the 15 year time period. Mayor Coughlin stated this was <br />• correct. He indicated that because this is an interim use, this was stipulated in the Ordinance. <br />Council Member Thomason stated she agreed that the billboards should be a similar as possible, <br />in order to conform to the billboards at the Bridges Golf Course. <br />