Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />August 28, 2000 <br />Page 14 <br />development is being proposed, dedication of new easements would not be needed. The City <br />Attorney has reviewed the Certificate of Survey and drafted the easement for the roadway <br />dedication, which was executed by the Bergeleens and sent to the County for recordation. <br />Planning Associate Ericson explained that most subdivisions, minor or major, are subject to park <br />dedication requirements. This request is unique in that, again, no new lot is being created and no <br />new development will occur. Staff has indicated to Mr. Bergeleen and Mr. Pearson that because <br />of this, no dedication would be required in this instance. The City Attorney has confirmed this <br />interpretation. <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that the Planning Commission and staff recommend <br />approval or Resolution 5463, a resolution approving a minor subdivision of 8132 Long Lake <br />Road for Leo and Patricia Bergeleen, subject to stipulations. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Thomason. To Wave the Reading and Approve Resolution 5463, a <br />Resolution Approving a Minor Subdivision of 8132 Long Lake Road. <br />Council Member Marty asked if the two property owners to the west were concerned about this <br />request and if they have been informed of this sale. Planning Associate Ericson stated he is <br />unable to answer that question. <br />• Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />Mayor Coughlin was not present for the vote. <br />I. Consideration of Resolution 5464, Approving Street Projects 2001-1, 2001-2. <br />Acting City Manager Ulrich explained that the proposed resolution will authorize staff to begin <br />the proceedings of Street Project 2002-1 County Road H2 and 2001-2 Residential Project No. 3. <br />These two projects were within the new proposed project map presented at the August 7th <br />Council Work Session. By authorizing these projects staff will send letters to the property <br />owners affected by the projects, informing them of the current policies regarding street <br />improvements. Staff will also be negotiating services from two different consulting engineering <br />firms to serve on the project teams. <br />Acting City Manager Ulrich advised that staff also spoke of establishing two Pavement <br />Condition Indexes (PCI), one that will be the rating at which the pavement segments will be <br />maintained and the other will be the rating at which the pavements will receive little if any <br />preventative or permanent maintenance. Staff is recommending that these two ratings be 75 and <br />45. At a level of 45, the roadway would only be patched to make it driveable until a future <br />roadway construction improvement is made. <br />• MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Wave the Reading and Approve Resolution 5464, <br />Approving Street Projects 2001-1, 2001-2 and to direct staff to establish two Pavement <br />Condition Indexes (PCI), ratings of 75 and 45, one that will be the rating at which the pavement <br />