My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2000/04/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - 2000/04/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:15:49 AM
Creation date
2/27/2025 10:46:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/28/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 28, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br />segments will be maintained and the other will be the rating at which the pavements will receive <br />little if any preventative or permanent maintenance. <br />Acting Mayor Stigney noted at one time the PCI was 70 and now it is being proposed at 75. He <br />stated he is uncomfortable with what that defines. He stated there are some concerns about one <br />of the projects in his area and suggested residents of that area be given an opportunity to provide <br />input. <br />Council Member Marty stated the consideration for approval is to authorize the scheduling of <br />neighborhood meetings to see what the neighbor's desire, not to initiate the project and start <br />paving. <br />Acting Mayor Stigney asked if residents will be able to make changes to the project prior to it <br />occurring and that this action does not allocate moving the project to start. Acting City Manager <br />Ulrich stated that is correct and he thinks a consulting engineer will be needed to address the <br />functionality of the roadway at some point in the process. He reviewed the issues that would be <br />addressed at the public informational meetings. <br />Acting Mayor Stigney stated his understanding this action will only bring it before the residents <br />and then, based on their input, it will be determined if the project moves forward or not. Acting <br />City Manager Ulrich stated that is correct and when before the Council they will be advised if <br />• there is or is not a favorable consensus of the residents. If there is no consensus, then the <br />Council will move on and consider the next project. <br />In response to Acting Mayor Stigney, Acting City Manager Ulrich stated staff was directed by <br />the Council to review the PCIs and the condition of the streets. He explained how a sealcoat <br />project does not increase the load capacities or strength of the roadway, but would raise the rating <br />by two to three points. <br />Acting Mayor Stigney stated since the resolution establishes a PCI of 75 and 45, he still objects. <br />Ayes - 3 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br />Mayor Coughlin was not present for the vote. <br />J. Consideration of Charter Commission Resolutions 2000-11, 2000-12. <br />The Interim City Administrator explained that staff presented Charter Commission Resolutions <br />2000-11 and 2000-12 to the City Council at the August 21, 2000 Work Session for review and <br />discussion. Staff was given direction to seek the City Attorney's opinion of these resolutions. <br />Findings were as follows: <br />1. The City was presented with Resolutions 2000-11 and 2000-12, which request and <br />extension of the review period, for an additional 90 days to consider Ordinances 661 and <br />662 on August 14, 2000. <br />2. These resolutions state that they were adopted on August 10, 2000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.