Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 9, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />Council Member Quick stated that when McCarty was Mayor, the policy of sending tapes to the <br />library was changed due to cost savings. It was easier to keep the tapes at the City Offices. <br />Council Member Marty questioned where the tapes would be if they are not at City Hall. He <br />asked if there is an accounting of them. He asked what tapes are missing, the dates and times of <br />the tapes, and why they would be missing. <br />City Administrator Miller responded she had asked Patrick to complete an inventory of tapes. <br />They were kept in cabinets in the community room. The cabinets oftentimes were not locked. <br />The key that was in Patrick's desk was taken. <br />Council Member Marty said he talked to Patrick on this issue. To Patrick's knowledge, the <br />cabinets were locked. City Administrator Miller stated she would often go down to those <br />cabinets and she found they weren't always locked. <br />Jane Stolelamb , 2305 Shorewood Road, stated she is providing the Council with a copy of a <br />petition that was mailed the previous week to the Environmental Quality Board. The petition <br />was prepared in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410. A copy was sent to the Rice <br />Creek Watershed. The petition is in regard to the Greenfield Park project and is requesting that <br />an environmental worksheet assessment be completed. There are 43 signatures on the petition; <br />only 25 were needed. The petition wasn't presented at every household due to the July 4 holiday. <br />. She explained that in early April or May, the Council voted to have an environmental impact <br />study completed. She said that Council Member Marty initiated the discussion. Then he decided <br />that the assessment would be too expensive. The motion to direct that an EIS not be done carned <br />with one no vote, which was by Council Member Stigney. There was no mention at the meeting <br />of what the cost would be or how much of the cost the City would bear. The petition states the <br />concerns, which include the amount of traffic, vehicle emissions, natural wetland preservation <br />and loss of wildlife and wildlife habitat. She added that an environmental impact study has been <br />conducted to learn if there is any concern. The residents disagree with the watershed report. <br />Mayor Sonterre responded that both Council Members Thomas and he had contacted the DNR <br />within the last two weeks. He was told the overall process hasn't been completed. He asked the <br />DNR what the additional cost would be for the EIS Study. <br />Council Member Marty explained he did make the motion, but then understood there was <br />significant cost involved. He offered to reverse his position if that is what the residents asked of <br />him. <br />Mayor Sonterre stated that the DNR indicated they would need a week or so to complete the <br />study and they will contact the Mayor when it is complete. <br />Dana Mandosa, 2633 Clearview Avenue observed that Council Member Marty's computer is <br />back in the Council Member's position. City Attorney Riggs stated that the computer was <br />confiscated for the purpose of specific issues and is still being analyzed. <br />