My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2001/10/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Minutes - 2001/10/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2025 2:24:04 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 2:24:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/8/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 8, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he read the Resolution so residents would know what Council <br />is talking about. He then indicated that, at the work session, the decision was to give gift <br />certificates to retiring employees and now it has been changed to all employees. <br />Assistant to the Administrator Reed indicated she thought it was the intent of Council to give gift <br />certificates to all employees celebrating an anniversary in five-year increments. <br />• <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he thought giving gift certificates was not a responsible way <br />to spend taxpayer dollars. He then indicated he is opposed to having two separate events of <br />$1,000 each as he feels it is irresponsible spending. He further indicated that, in light of the fact <br />that the City is way over its budget, he feels it inappropriate to approve a new Resolution <br />approving an expenditure of funds. He then said he feels the timing is wrong. <br />Council Member Thomas clarified that Council had discussed that the City needed to have a <br />policy on the books for how to fund annual events that are already occurring. She then said <br />Council does not want this to be a horrible place to work. She also indicated that employees and <br />volunteers are two entirely different groups that deserve to be recognized as such. Council <br />Member Thomas indicated that the Resolution brought by Staff is exactly what Council had <br />asked for at the work session. <br />Council Member Quick concurred with Council Member Thomas. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he did not support the Resolution. <br />Council Member Quick asked if Council Member Stigney was referring to next year's budget <br />when he indicated the City was over budget. He then asked Council Member Stigney if the <br />budget had been finalized. <br />Council Member Stigney said, "no." <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 1(Stigney) Motion carried. <br />C7 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Approve Consent Agenda Item 6H as Presented. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he would like the Resolution read. <br />Council Member Stigney read Resolution 5632, A Resolution Approving a Wage Adjustment for <br />Longevity Pay (9%) for Tom Kinney. <br />Council Member Stigney questioned whether Mr. Kinney was a member of Loca1204 as an <br />investigator. <br />Assistant to the Administrator Reed indicated Mr. Kinney is an investigator but is paid under the <br />patrol contract as there is no separate agreement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.