My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2001/10/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Minutes - 2001/10/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2025 2:24:04 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 2:24:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/8/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 8, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />Council Member Stigney noted the employees at the Police Department receive annual wage <br />increases on a schedule and assuming they are cumulative they receive an additional 25% over <br />and above their base rate. <br />Assistant to the Administrator Reed indicated she did not have the contract with her but said she <br />trusts what Council Member Stigney read was from the contract. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that under the current contract employees would be receiving <br />an additional $225.00 per month and under next year's contract an extra $235.00 per month. He <br />then told Council it needed to watch what kind of contracts are approved. <br />The Deputy Police Chief indicated the clause had been in effect since he started in 1980 and <br />noted the pay increases are not cumulative. He also noted the college incentive credits are not <br />applicable to anyone on the force and need not be in the contract. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 1(Stigney) Motion carried. <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />A. Public Hearing Considering the Reconstruction of County Road H2 <br />Mayor Sonterre opened the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. <br />Barry Peters indicated this was a public hearing for the County Road H2 improvements and <br />asked Council if it wanted a formal presentation or a review of new information received via the <br />surveys. <br />It was the consent of Council to hear the new information received from the surveys. <br />Mr. Peters indicated the survey had been sent to 93 residents and he had received 39 responses. <br />He then indicated that of those 39 responses 31 wanted the road reconstructed to state aid <br />standards. He further indicated that there was an area on the survey asking if residents wanted <br />parking and 14 said no parking and 15 said yes to parking. <br />Mr. Peters indicated the costs had not changed nor had the assessments. <br />Council Member Thomas asked what the state aid requirements for the roadway were. <br />Mr. Peters indicated the state aid requirements are in regards to the width of the roadway. He <br />then indicated that the storm sewer and curb and gutter are a matter of good engineering practice. <br />Council Member Stigney questioned if curb and gutter was required. <br />• Mr. Peters indicated that it was. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.