Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Mounds View City Council November 26, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />. City Attorney Riggs indicated the recess was called so that he could give Council legal advice <br />concerning the fitness equipment. <br />5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />None. <br />6. CONSENT AGENDA <br />A. Approve Just and Correct Claims <br />B. Licenses for Approval <br />C. Resolution 5652 Approving a Step Increase for Jeremiah Anderson <br />D. Resolution 5653 Approving a Step Increase for Debbie Jasper <br />E. Resolution 5654 Approving a Step Increase for Lois Lestina-Yost <br />F. Resolution 5655 Approving a Charitable Gambling Application for the Lions <br />G. Resolution 5656 Closing City Hall for Christmas Eve, December 24, 2001 <br />H. Resolution 5658 Reclassifying the Assistant to the City Administrator position to <br />Assistant City Administrator and Re-pointing the Position <br />Council Member Marty requested that Items 6E and 6H be removed for discussion. <br />Council Member Quick requested that Item 6F be removed for discussion. <br />Mayor Sonterre requested that Item 6A be removed for discussion. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Marty. To Approve Consent Agenda Items 6B, C, D, and G as <br />presented. <br />Council Member Stigney requested that the Resolutions for Items 6C, D, and G be read. <br />City Administrator Miller read Resolutions 5652, 5653, and 5656. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Sonterre/Quick. To Approve Consent Agenda Item 6A as presented. <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that he had attended a meeting with URS, Ramsey County, and <br />Community Development Director Ericson to discuss the "leap frog" design that had been <br />presented at the public meeting and at a Council work session. He then indicated he was <br />concerned to find out that URS had not really looked into the logistics of actually doing the "leap <br />frog" option. He further indicated he was put off somewhat to learn that this option was given to <br />Council without complete review and URS could not confirm, at the meeting, whether the project <br />could be made a reality due to adequate right of way and utility issues. <br />• <br />