Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 26, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that Council had not asked URS to present hypothetical situations to <br />the public and Council and suggested holding the payment to URS until more work was done to <br />make the proposal realistic. <br />Council Member Thomas indicated she was not happy with any of the plans provided by URS. <br />She then commented that she thought the City was clear when it told URS that the City wanted <br />safety issues addressed and wanted to foster a downtown feeling. She then indicated that she did <br />not see anything that Council had specifically asked for actually addressed in the proposals. She <br />further indicated that she would like to make a motion to send the options back to URS and ask <br />them to address the priorities given to them because she is uncomfortable paying them until they <br />do the job they were asked to do. <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that the City was under time constraints when this process started but <br />said that Ramsey County had determined that a mill and overlay would not hamper <br />redevelopment opportunities because that redevelopment would not take place prior to 2005 <br />which means that the City is no longer being pressured by Ramsey County to provide a plan by <br />the end of the year. He then commented he feels the City should do a more thorough <br />investigation into any proposed redevelopment plans. <br />Council Member Thomas suggested a friendly amendment to Mayor Sonterre's motion to <br />approve Item 6A to request that the options provided by URS be sent back to them and ask them <br />to address the safety issues and other issues they were originally asked to address with their <br />proposals. <br />Mayor Sonterre amended his motion to approve Item 6A without Check Number 107081 to URS <br />and to direct Staff to ask URS to re-examine the priorities of the City for the County Highway 10 <br />redevelopment and come back to Council with a new and better plan. <br />Council Member Stigney asked what was being sent through Mailbox Express for $76.82. <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated that fund 730 was the sewer department for shipping but <br />indicated he was not sure what was shipped. <br />Council Member Marty inquired as to why the City was paying Sunrise United Methodist Church <br />$14.00. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated that amount was an employee contribution. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />Council Member Stigney made a point of order that he did not think it was correct procedure for <br />Roberts Rules of Order to make a motion for approval of the item before discussing it because <br />discussion is needed to determine the type of motion that should be made. He then indicated that <br />at the last few meetings the procedure has changed. <br />