Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 26, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated that any item pulled from the Consent Agenda needs to be handled <br />in the same fashion as other items on the agenda. He then indicated that Roberts Rules of Order <br />is not a clear edict or law and the procedure depends on what Council wants to do. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that it seems illogical to move approval of the item prior to <br />discussion. <br />Council Member Thomas indicated that the matter was discussed by full Council and everyone <br />agreed that to bring order to the discussion Council would change its procedure to have a motion <br />on the floor. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Quick. To Approve Consent Agenda Item 6E as presented. <br />Council Member Marty questioned why this employee was being given a half step increase rather <br />than a full step. <br />Acting Chief Brennan indicated that because this employee was hired in at Step 4 she was told <br />that she would not move to Step 5 until her one-year anniversary but there is a six-month review <br />that usually contains the step move. <br />Council Member Marty asked when the step increase is typically given. <br />Acting Chief Brennan indicated that a step increase is usually given at the six-month process. <br />Council Member Thomas indicated that to her recollection Council had determined that due to <br />the employee staring at Step 4 she would not go to Step 5 after six months but would be required <br />to wait until one year and the half step covers an increase for the six month period. <br />Council Member Marty asked City Administrator Miller to research the matter and bring it back <br />before Council at the next meeting. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Table Resolution 5654 to the December 10, 2001 <br />Pending Further Information. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Approve Consent Agenda Item 6F as presented. <br />Council Member Quick questioned whether there were some changes to the licensing for the <br />Lions. <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that the previous owner of the establishment, prior to passing away, <br />had expressed an interest in changing the licensing. <br />t <br />