My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2025/02/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2025
>
Agenda Packets - 2025/02/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2025 6:03:43 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 12:37:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/24/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION 10066 <br /> CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> CHANGES TO THE DISEASED TREE ORDINANCE AND PROCEDURES <br /> WHEREAS, Public Works facilitates the Forestry duties for the City, these duties include <br /> but are not limited to maintaining the trees in/on City grounds and ROW (Rights of way), and as <br /> per City code, diseased trees regarding private Elm, Oak and Ash trees; and <br /> WHEREAS, the current policy / practice has had the City providing a contract with a tree <br /> removal contractor that includes the cost for private tree removal; and <br /> WHERAS, Public Works notifies the property owner if there is a diseased tree(s) on the <br /> property and the associated cost; and <br /> WHERAS, once the trees are removed the contractor invoices the City for the total <br /> removal costs, Finance is provided the address and amount(s) for the private trees and the <br /> property owners are invoiced for the removals; and <br /> WHEREAS, during the February 3, 2025 Work Session meeting — Council directed Staff <br /> to review the current program and modify how private trees are handled; and <br /> WHEREAS, Council requested that in 2025 private tree would be marked, notices given to <br /> the property owner with options for removal including the City Contractors information. City Staff <br /> would not follow up with the property owner on the removal and the City contractor would not need <br /> to remove the tree and invoice the City for the removal; and <br /> WHEREAS, Staff is requesting the City Council to review the information and provide Staff <br /> with further direction regarding the current program/policy, options include the following; <br /> 1) Keep program/procedures as is by continuing to provide private property with rates for tree <br /> removals as outlined in the agreement with a tree removal contractor. <br /> 2) Revise the program to include the contractor providing rates/costs for boulevard trees, and for <br /> the Contractor to provide a cost on privately owned diseased tree removals solely for the <br /> property owner to make the decision. <br /> 3) Revise the program and provide a cost for boulevard trees only. Private tree removals and <br /> locating a contractor would be the responsibility of the property owner. Timeline for removal <br /> would be set by the City Arborist and adhered to by the Property Owner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.