Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 22 <br />Council Member Quick asked what the City needed to do next. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the former employee can appeal the decision but she is not <br />certain whether he will do so. She then indicated that this is a huge win for the City because <br />determinations such as this do not often go in favor of employers. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked what monetary result occurs in this situation. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the City does not have unemployment insurance and pays its <br />own unemployment claims. She then indicated the City would be reapid the dollars that were <br />paid for unemployment for Mr. Kesel. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked for the dollar amount. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated she could look into the dollar amount and provide that <br />information. <br />Council Member Quick asked if the decision could be read from Page 4 of the document. <br />City Administrator Miller read the decision on Page 4 for Council. It is as follows: <br />"On June 7, 2001 the applicant was discharged because of employment misconduct. The <br />applicant is disqualified until the end of the calendar week that the applicant has total earnings in <br />subsequent covered employment of eight times the applicant's weekly benefit amount. Benefits <br />paid to the applicant, if any, shall be charged to the reimbursable account of the employer. The <br />employer has elected to be liable for payments in lieu of taxes. <br />The determination under appeal is reversed." <br />Council Member Marty asked what the last line meant. <br />City Administrator Miller clarified that the City does not have unemployment insurance and pays <br />directly for unemployment claims. She then noted the document goes onto state how the City <br />can recover those payments already made. <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the employee can appeal the decision again. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the employee has 30 days from February 27, 2002 to appeal <br />the decision. <br />Council Member Marty asked if the document received was two copies of the same thing. <br />• <br />