My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/03/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/03/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2025 12:49:57 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 12:49:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated the charges were for one individual and said he believes that the <br />charges are for dinner as well as an equally divided charge for membership. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated she would research the matter and provide further <br />information. <br />Council Member Marty asked Staff to research the answers to his questions on Check 107735, <br />107736, 107749 and report back to Council. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />MOTIONlSECOND: Quick/Marty. To Approve Consent Agenda Item C as Presented. <br />Council Member Marty indicated he wanted to thank Mr. Keckeisen publicly for his service to <br />the City. <br />Council Member Stigney read Resolution 5721. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Approve Consent Agenda Item E as Presented. <br />Council Member Marty indicated he was wondering if the payment was calculated on the net <br />and, if not, said he thinks it should be changed to reflect that. He then asked for the status of the <br />RFP for management of the banquet center. He further commented that it appears the payment is <br />calculated based on the 78.88% of gross revenues calculation that has been found not to be in the <br />best interest of the City. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the City is still operating under the current management <br />contract because the City has not severed its relationship with Innovative Images. She further <br />explained that because the relationship has not been severed with Innovative Images, the City is <br />not in a position to renegotiate the contract. <br />Council Member Stigney pointed out the last paragraph says net revenues but paragraph five says <br />gross revenues. <br />Mary _Tatarack indicated she had worked with the table but not the Resolution and explained <br />how the calculation was arrived at. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated she believed the term gross should be net based on Exhibit A <br />because the number in the Resolution is referred to in the chart as a net number. <br />Council Member Marty indicated he would like to table this matter for further clarification in <br />. order to avoid issues with miscalculations as in the past. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.