My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/03/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/03/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2025 12:50:21 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 12:50:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/25/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 25, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 19 <br />Finance Director Hansen explained that, in the beginning of this arrangement, the City was <br />paying in advance and has gone to paying late and he would like permission to pay on a monthly <br />basis because after discussing the matter with the auditor and the management company the <br />confusion as to how to calculate the management fee has been resolved and the matter should <br />become routine. <br />Council Member Marty commented that in the Staff report it refers to the problem as an <br />administrative issue with the former finance director. He then said it is happening with this <br />finance director as well. <br />City Administrator Miller clarified that it is not the same situation. With the former finance <br />director the numbers were continually changing up and down and this is simply a request to <br />increase the fees paid due to increased revenue being submitted. <br />Council Member Marty said he thought it was a good idea but in light of the additional revenue <br />transactions coming in late he suggested a two month delay to allow for accurate figures. <br />Council Member Quick said he did not agree as he feels people should be paid in a timely <br />manner. <br />Council Member Marty said he wanted to get accurate figures after all revenues are in. <br />Council Member Quick indicated the issue is the City needs to pay its bills in a timely fashion. <br />Council Member Marty asked whether the term net revenues is the correct term to be used <br />because he was told at the last meeting that the new contract was based on gross revenues. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated this is a correction to the Resolution and said the City is <br />operating under the same conditions as the other contract. <br />Council Member Marty commented that the other one operated on gross. He then said the City <br />may be paying on net when it should be gross. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated it was her understanding that the City is operating under net <br />revenues and said she would review the matter with the Finance Director. <br />Council Member Thomas explained that the contract used gross revenues defined to apply to a <br />certain type of revenue and this Resolution would correct an error in terminology as the number <br />was a net number. She further explained that all revenues were not included which means <br />revenues cannot be called gross revenues. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked if the language is consistent with language in the contract. <br />• City Administrator Miller indicated that Staff and the auditor's office are recommending <br />approval. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.