Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 10, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />1 Council Member Stigney indicated that the City gets the same money regardless of whether they <br />2 use breakout rooms and he has an issue with tying in the Community Ed space to the banquet <br />3 center to allow the manager to get the money. He then asked what the buyout figure is. <br />4 <br />5 Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated the amount is $28,500 and after the <br />6 $10,000 payment the City payout would be $18,500. He then indicated that from the standpoint <br />7 of having monthly payment the City is assured of covering overhead costs and that is his goal and <br />8 the $6,000 from either party covers overhead for both areas. He further commented that <br />9 continuing along the same path the City would certainly have substantial losses on the <br />1 o Community Ed area. <br />11 <br />12 Council Member Stigney indicated he would have liked to see the City go for an RFP with or <br />13 without the Community Ed space to see how much could be garnered using both spaces <br />14 separately. He then said he has an issue with the buyout being $28,500 when the first offer was <br />1 s to payoff at $10,000. <br />16 <br />17 Mayor Linke indicated the original settlement offer was no longer an option. <br />18 <br />19 Council Member Stigney indicated he has an issue with the $10,000 contribution to do business <br />20 in the City and several questions with the RFP so he will not support this regardless of which <br />21 business Council chooses. He then said he does not think the City should wait until June to go <br />~2 out for an RFP and he would prefer to look at the banquet center and the Community Ed space <br />23 and get all the options before paying $28,500. <br />24 <br />25 Council Member Gunn indicated that both proposals looked good but she feels The Mermaid is <br />26 the one she feels confident can move in and get up to speed right away. <br />27 <br />28 MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Marty. To Approve the Banquet Center Interim Agreement With <br />29 The Mermaid. <br />30 <br />31 Council Member Gunn indicated she picked The Mermaid mostly because of the staff, the <br />32 amount of staff that they have and the years of experience that they have. <br />33 <br />34 Council Member Marty agreed and said that the one thing that caught his eye was the marketing <br />35 ability of The Mermaid and noted that they have spent $129,000 this year on marketing. He then <br />36 said that in the proposal The Mermaid has marketing planned for each month. <br />37 <br />38 Council Member Marty indicated that The Mermaid staff is assembled and ready to go and the <br />39 Roberts team would come on board to form an organization for this project. He then said that <br />4o both proposals were very good but the edge went to The Mermaid for him. <br />41 <br />42 Mr. Waste indicated they would like to have the chance to do the ramp up and this is 14 months <br />3 worth of work. He then said that, as for staffing, no one carries that many people on the payroll <br />~4 and would have to hire. <br />45 <br />