My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2004/04/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Minutes - 2004/04/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 1:48:42 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 1:48:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/26/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Apri126, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />Council Member Marty commented that the church has reserved the right to make adjustments in <br />the amounts given to the City if community or church circumstances change significantly so the <br />amounts are not guaranteed. <br />Council Member Marry indicated he struggled with his decision but does not feel he could <br />approve this amendment. <br />Council Member Gunn indicated she is for this amendment because of the good that the church <br />can do for the community. She then said that the building is going to be empty and the church <br />has offered some monetary compensation to the City in addition to the services they can bring to <br />the community. <br />Council Member Stigney said that he would like to say that Bethlehem Baptist may be desirable <br />for the City to have but he disagrees with the location picked for this. He then said this is a TIF <br />district for the purpose of economic development and the reason the building was built was to <br />create jobs and improve the tax base. He further indicated that Mounds View is struggling with <br />taxes dollar wise and he thinks this is a perpetual thing and the dollars are locked in and grow at <br />2% but his taxes went up to 30% this year. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that his major objection is the dollar amounts because they do <br />not add up as to what he thinks they should and he feels approval of this amendment would be a <br />long term detriment to the taxpayers of this City and he feels that would be irresponsible. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated the County and school distnct would also be excluded from <br />taxes and that impacts all other residents. He then said he feels it is wrong to do it in this <br />location but he would welcome the church to come in another location. <br />Mayor Linke indicated that he is concerned with the financials but the church has offered to <br />partially compensate for the amounts the City would lose and the intangibles that the church can <br />provide would be a benefit for the City. <br />Mayor Linke commented that he does have concerns about the finances for the City but, on the <br />other hand, the intangibles that the church would bring to the community are a great benefit. He <br />then said that this was a very difficult decision for him but he will vote in favor of this because of <br />the intangibles that are invaluable as a benefit to the community. He further commented that he <br />has put a lot of time, effort, and consideration into his decision. <br />Council Member Stigney commented that there is a Highway 10 corridor development going <br />through the area and he thinks the whole area will benefit from keeping it industrial for jobs and <br />rental or leasing. He then said his other point is that he thinks this property could be built out <br />more than what it is right now. He further commented that he thinks this is the wrong location in <br />the City for the church. <br />Mayor Linke indicated the property is built out due to the parking requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.