Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Apri126, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />Council Member Marty indicated that this was hard for him to decide but he feels this is his best <br />. decision on behalf of the taxpayers in the City. He then said that the taxes in Mounds View right <br />now are higher than surrounding communities and he feels it is his responsibility to look out for <br />the residents and do what he canto keep taxes in line. He further commented that losing this <br />property as a taxable parcel for the City means that the residents and the people that live here will <br />have to pay more as local property taxes will go up. <br />Mayor Linke indicated that Finance Director Hansen provided a memo that will be discussed <br />later and he then provided information from the memo concerning the property tax analysis that <br />was done. <br />Ayes - 3 Nays - 2(Mariy/Stigney) Motion carried. <br />D. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 734, an Ordinance Amending <br />Chapter 513 Pertaining to Adult Oriented Businesses. <br />• <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated this is the second reading of Ordinance 734 <br />amending Chapter 513 and indicated the only change from the last meeting was inputting the <br />$5,000 license fee as discussed at the last meeting and a summary page added to the Ordinance <br />because the City Charter provides Staff with the ability to publish a summary of the Ordinance. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Approve the Second Reading, Waive the Reading and <br />Adopt Ordinance 734, an Ordinance Amending Chapter 513 Pertaining to Adult Oriented <br />Businesses. <br />ROLL CALL: Linke/Quick/Marty/Stigney/Gunn. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />E. Resolution 6232 Setting an Assessment Hearing Date of May 24, 2004, <br />Authorizing Advertisement for the Hearing, Declaring Cost to~ be Assessed, <br />and Ordering the Preparation of Proposed Assessment for the 2003 Street <br />Improvement Project. <br />• <br />Council Member Marry asked whether the Silver Lake Woods Condominiums could still be <br />included in the project. <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated they could be included but it would need to be as a change <br />order. He then noted the Homeowners' Association was aware of the deadlines and the reason an <br />agreement could not be reached is because there are issues with who owns the streets. <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated he has been in discussions with the attorney for the Homeowners' <br />Association and it was discovered by the Silver Lake Woods folks that there was a transfer of the <br />street so everyone of the unit owners would have to execute the petition. <br />