Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 8, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />• Director Ericson stated that this item was brought to the Council's attention at the November 1St <br />work session, and that this ordinance puts into play some regulations and mechanisms by which <br />the city can recover costs incurred in the event of a drug lab cleanup. He stated that although <br />there has not been a problem in Mounds View in this regard, other cities had had problems. He <br />stated that this merges the ordinances from New Brighton and Coon Rapids that would give the <br />city added protection. He stated the ordinance as drafted would allow for cost recovery in the <br />vent that the cleanup extends off site, or if the neighboring property owners are displaced or have <br />to be evacuated. He stated that it is appropriate to go after the property owner if the tenant or <br />guest is causing the problem, because the City Attorney has indicated it's the most appropriate <br />method to recover costs, and then the property owner would have the right to recover those costs <br />back from the individual who may have rented the facility, or was a guest in a motel, and that is a <br />risk that anybody who has rental property has. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Gunn. To waive the reading and approve the First Reading of <br />Ordinance 753 as presented. <br />Ayes -5 Nays - 0 Motion carried <br />E. Resolution 6372, Approving Mermaid Request for Reimbursement of Leasehold <br />Improvements. <br />City Clerk/Administrator Ulrich stated that lien waivers had been received from OEB for the <br />. furniture and office work that was done, and there had been a Waiver of Mechanic's Lien <br />provided for the carpet work that was done. He stated the final amount is $6,678, and that <br />reimbursement is not legally required, but staff believes it would be a good business practice. <br />Mayor Linke asked if that amount was before or after the damage deposit was deducted, and City <br />Clerk/Administrator Ulrich stated that that was after. <br />Mayor Linke read the resolution aloud. <br />Council Member Stigney asked what Invoices 16855 and 16856 were for. <br />Council Member Gunn said they were for walls and panels and connectors. <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gum~/Marty. To adopt Resolution 6372, Approving Mermaid Request for <br />Reimbursement of Leasehold Improvements. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he would not support this because the Mermaid had cost them a <br />lot of money by bowing out of the lease two months early and taking all the bookings for the next <br />year. He stated it's costing the city $2,000 a month for the new lease. <br />Council Member Quick stated he feels the same way Council Member Stigney does, and that it's <br />• not a legal obligation to reimburse the leasehold improvements. <br />