Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council April 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br />with the signage issues right now. <br />Mayor Marty reviewed the needs for the front entry facade stating that the vestibule entry area <br />should be fixed. He agreed that they would have to make due with what they have and fix what <br />has to be fixed. He stated that he does not see the Police Department entry or the bathrooms, as <br />an option as they both have to be ADA Compliant. <br />Public Works Director Lee reviewed the generator connection stating that it is a connection that <br />runs cable from the generator and outfits the building to accept cable. The building is also being <br />outfitted to use as an emergency facility if necessary and the generator would provide backup <br />power to the building. <br />Council Member Thomas asked if there are any tuck-pointing or fascia issues to be addressed on <br />the front of the building. Ms. Schultz stated that there are no tuck-pointing or fascia issues to <br />address. <br />Mayor Marty asked if there is any way to fix the vestibule. Ms. Schultz stated no and explained <br />that it is not insulated properly and does not have a barrier to the outside. She stated that this <br />would be bid separately noting that one of the bigger concerns is the type of construction on the <br />wall to the west side. She stated that some tests were done and it appears to be dry but needs to <br />be watched over time. <br />• Council Member Thomas referenced the roof and asked if there was any discussion regarding the <br />pitch of the roof. <br />Ms. Schultz stated that all roofs have pitches and flat roofs can work. She stated that there is a <br />proposal to change this in phases and it is proposed along with the new HVAC systems. She <br />explained that it would be a half-inch per foot noting that if they did a build up or membrane <br />style it would be better than what they currently have. <br />Council Member Thomas asked if it could go to two-inches per foot. <br />Ms. Schultz confirmed that it could. She assured Council that they would try to get as much as <br />possible without driving up the costs too much. <br />Mayor Marty noted that a letter from S.E.H., dated March 23, 2005, references lump sum fees in <br />the amount of $51,800 for the bidding document phase and asked if they have any idea or <br />estimate as to what the reimbursements might be. <br />Ms. Schultz stated that they could expect $6500.00 for this size project. <br />Council Member Flaherty expressed concerns that they are working with estimated costs. He <br />stated that he would prefer actual costs for the architecture or that it states `not to exceed'. He <br />referenced the reimbursable expenses related to project, mileage and meals, stating that typically <br />they do not receive reimbursement for meals and asked if this is common. He asked them to <br />