My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/06/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/06/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:16:59 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:16:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 13, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 19 <br />• Mayor Many stated that this relates somewhat to Item 8D that was pulled from the Council <br />agenda and asked when this would come back to Council for consideration. <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated that he did receive some feedback from the <br />Environmental Quality Board noting that they have indicated that the Comprehensive Plan <br />should be adopted prior to the AUAR being adopted, which is why this was pulled from the <br />agenda. He stated that this would not be brought back before Council until a decision has been <br />made regarding the ultimate use of the golf course. <br />Council Member Flaherty clarified that the City contracted with RLK to come up with a <br />comprehensive land use plan for that particular territory adding that he can only assume that part <br />of the process developed that there would be approvals and changes from other agencies and <br />asked why RLK was not aware that the approval would have to go through other agencies. <br />Community Development Director Ericson acknowledged the concerns stating that this was a <br />difficult .and time consuming land use amendment. He noted that normally this is not <br />controversial and not to the extent when talking about 72-acres. He agreed that they should have <br />given RLK a heads up that to adjust their estimates. He stated that no one anticipated that any <br />agencies would take issue with this that did and then the amount of time and number of meetings <br />necessary to achieve consent for the project. He agreed that it could have been given some <br />thought noting that it went beyond their anticipation to see this project through. <br />• MOTION/SECOND Gunn/Stigney To waive the reading and approve Resolution 6560, <br />Authorizing Additional Compensation to RLK-Kuusisto for work associated with the <br />Comprehensive Land Use Amendment, with the amendment that the reimbursables not exceed <br />$6,500. <br />Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried as amended. <br />Mayor Marty stated that he questions the whole comprehensive plan change. He stated that once <br />they do accept the change it takes the whole golf course and they have not actually accepted the <br />project to redevelop at this time. He stated that if they accept the Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment it could impact this. <br />Community Development Director Ericson acknowledged that this is a valid point and explained <br />that this is something that had to be done regardless of what happens with Medtronic and the golf <br />course. He stated that this is being done to maintain consistency with the zoning board with <br />respect to the billboards so that the billboards would be legitimate. He noted that the City <br />Attorney also recommended this. <br />Council Member Thomas stated that the group authorized the work adding that the meetings are <br />more than expected. She stated that this comes after the fact and should have been anticipated <br />sooner. <br />• Council Member Flaherty agreed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.