My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/06/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/06/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:16:59 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:16:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 13, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 18 <br />• Mayor Marty referenced Item 9K stating that in the staff report, first paragraph, about <br />advertisements that would appear with Star Tribune, and several other newspapers noting that the <br />Pioneer Press is the official City newspaper. He is wondering if this is a typo and is there a <br />reason it is being placed in the Star Tribune. <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that the reason the ad is being placed in the <br />Star Tribune is because the paper is a more widely circulated daily publication and it would <br />receive more exposure. He further explained that historically they have always published the <br />City employment notices in Star Tribune in order to reach a wider base of candidates. <br />MOTION/SECOND Marty/Flaherty To waive the reading and approve Resolution 6559, <br />Authorizing the Posting of a Vacancy in Community Development Department and Approving <br />Supplemental Summer Staffing. <br />Ayes-S Nays-0 Motion carried. <br />L. Resolution 6560, A Resolution Authorizing Additional Compensation to <br />RLK-Kuusisto for Work Associated with the Comprehensive Land Use <br />Amendment. <br />Mayor Marty referenced Item 9L stating that he pulled this because they are coming back and <br />asking for more money. He noted that in first paragraph they reference the expedited schedule <br />and they were aware of the expedited schedule from the beginning and this is the reason the City <br />decided to go with them. <br />Community Development Director Ericson acknowledged stating that this it is an issue of <br />coordinating several meetings between them and the DNR. He explained that there was some <br />juggling of the schedule to balance out requirements from the Environmental Quality Board <br />noting that there is 'an additional concern on the transportation issues being adequately reflected. <br />He stated that RLK was upfront in that this was not a typical land use. He stated that they regret <br />having to come back to ask for additional funding noting that it is deserved, as they have gone <br />above and beyond and having the document prepared by the Council would brings it to fruition. <br />Mayor Many stated that it is noted in the resolution, the last few words state `at a cost not to <br />exceed $6,000.00' yet on the previous page the total estimate in parenthesis suggests that it could <br />be more than this. He stated that he would like further clarification. <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated that he is not aware of what delivery fees or <br />reimbursable expenses there may be in relationship to this request. He agreed that he should <br />have researched this prior to bringing it to Council. He suggested that the resolution be amended <br />to not exceed $6,500.00 or they could table action until they can get a better response on what the <br />reimbursables would run. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.