My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/07/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/07/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:18:26 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:18:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br />this time and they wanted to know what they could do to change this. He explained that this is <br />• just a matter of information. <br />Council Member Thomas asked why this matter of information would be appropriate to this <br />venue. She stated that having served on the Planning Commission she knows how to go about <br />getting answers to a question as it would be brought forward and discussed with the Planning <br />Commission to readdress the issues, should it be necessary. She stated that she does not believe <br />that speaking for nameless individuals, who have recourse to do so with the Planning <br />Commission, should they wish too. She stated that something seems inappropriate here noting <br />that if the Planning Commissioners wish to readdress this with the Planning Commission she <br />would encourage them to do so as this is the appropriate body to do that. She stated that to go to <br />the Mayor and have the Mayor announce it at a meeting is not the proper forum. <br />Mayor Marty noted that he felt totally different about this in February adding that as things have <br />come to fruition he began to believe that this is not the best deal for the City of Mounds View. <br />MOTION/SECOND. Thomas/Gunn. To approve Resolution 6540 and waive the reading, <br />Approving a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment for The Bridges of Mounds View Golf <br />Course Site. <br />Ayes-4 Nays-1 (Marty) Motion carried. <br />• D. Resolution 6541 Accepting and Approving the Final Draft of The Bridges <br />Office Development Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Document. <br />Director Ericson stated this item was authorized by the Economic Development Authority on <br />September 13, 2004 as a means to address the potential development out at The Bridges Golf <br />Course. He stated that the City authorized RLKISYSCO to work on the AUAR, which they have <br />done. He stated that they have published the preliminary and final drafts of the AUAR noting <br />that the City has received a lot of positive feedback from agencies. He stated that there has been <br />a lot of participation and teamwork coordination with the Cities of Blaine and Shoreview, Anoka <br />County, Ramsey County, MnDOT, and the Department of Natural Resources. He stated that a lot <br />of meetings were held and a lot of information was shared back and forth throughout the process. <br />He stated that the area of primary concern, which. was common across all agencies, was the <br />transportation impacts given that County Road J does not function right now at peak <br />performance. He stated that there are issues with regards to the deficiencies with the <br />transportation system and RLK has put together a transportation impact plan. He noted that they <br />have actually received some funding from the State of Minnesota to do some improvements to <br />County Road J and the bridge over 35W. He stated that the AUAR documents are available for <br />Council's acceptance and approval. He indicated that earlier public meetings it was prefaced that <br />the Council's approval of this document does not, in any way, obligate the Council to take any <br />action on the Medtronic development. He explained that it is simply is an assessment of the <br />impact at the golf course if a development should occur. He stated that the issue is before <br />Council again noting that the public hearing was held on May 23, 2005 and they are back for <br />• acceptance and approval of this document. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.