Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council 3uly 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meefing Page 21 <br />• Council Member Thomas clarified that this is the same as the Spring Creek Regional Pond report <br />and Council is just accepting the document they are giving the Council. <br />Carol Mueller stated she is very concerned about the impact study not including the residential <br />streets. She stated that it is apparent that the feeling was that the main access roads would be <br />County J, Central Avenue, 35W and US Highway 10 noting that she believes the new employees <br />in town would use the inner streets including Silver Lake Road, Long Lake Road, and Red Oak <br />Drive. She stated that she is very concerned that they do not have the means to enforce and <br />control the speeds. She stated that people run stop signs as it is and with the potential for <br />additional 3000 to 6000 vehicles on their streets she believes this is something that definitely <br />should be reviewed and considered. She stated that she really hopes that with the improvements <br />the City is planning to do on County Road J that the City would consider repairing the potholes <br />and the existing roads. She asked that the City not narrow the roads and plan to do serious traffic <br />controls to make sure the streets are still safe for the pedestrian residents. <br />Director Ericson stated that Ms Mueller brings up some good points noting that the City did ask <br />RLK to examine the transportation impacts not only on a regional transportation basis but also <br />for the internal road system within Mounds View. He stated that given the proximity to 3 5 W, <br />US Highway 10, Highway 65 and County Road J that it would be highly unlikely that there <br />would be any appreciable impact to the Mounds View roadways. He agreed that there could be <br />some people, who live in New Brighton or other surrounding areas, that could use internal street <br />• systems but it would be unlikely that they would try to navigate through the residential areas <br />rather than utilize another easier traveled roadway. He stated that the bottom line with the RLK <br />memo, that was included in the Council packet that they believe that any local traffic would be <br />negligible adding that if there are concerns with a lot of traffic going into Mounds View that <br />maybe some of these people would stop at local businesses to make purchases. <br />Council Member Thomas noted Ms. Mueller's comments stating that this is a problem the City <br />would have to address regardless. She assured Ms. Mueller that the Council has talked a lot <br />about the residential road problems noting that no matter what goes on with the improvements <br />for County Road J it is something the Council does have to review. <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road asked if the billboards should support a golf course or <br />should the golf course support itself. <br />Mayor Marty stated that if the golf course can't support itself due to lawsuits and bonds the City <br />then has to find another way to finance it so that the residents aren't taxed for it. <br />Mr. Jahnke stated that he does not personally believe that using the excuse that the City lost the <br />lawsuit that it should make a difference after ten years. He stated that every business experiences <br />bumps adding that his question was not answered. He asked if the Cits~ believes that billboards <br />should support a golf course. He stated that figures show that the golf course won't support itself <br />without the billboards. <br /> <br />