Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br />• Dr. Belting stated that. he did consider this location noting that due to the numbers it was not <br />feasible and he decided that he would prefer to own his own building. <br />Tom Belting, 1911 Park Avenue, stated that the concept they had done with Landcor was strictly <br />leasing the space. He explained that their concept would be to condo the unit where they could <br />either lease or own the space, as it would tie them to the community for a longer period of time. <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Thomas To Approve Resolution 6588 Approving the Amendment <br />to the Walgreen's PUD Agreement by adding `Office' as an allowed use on Lot 2, Block 2, <br />Mounds View City Hall Addition, Parcel 2, Mounds View Planning Case PA2005-001 and <br />waive the reading. <br />Ayes-3 .Nays-2 (Stigney, Flaherty) Motion carried. <br />C. Consider Resolution 6583, Approving the Final Plans and Specifications and <br />Setting a Bid Date for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project. <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that detailed plans and specifications have been completed for <br />the City Hall Renovation project and have been included for Council's review. He stated that <br />should this project proceed, the next step would be to approve the plans and specifications, as <br />submitted and set a bid date. He stated that an August 24, 2005 bid date would allow ample time <br />to do the proper notification as required by Chapter 8 of the City Charter. He stated that the next <br />. step at that time, should City Council decide to proceed, would be an action to award a <br />construction contract, award a storage and moving contract, approve a contract amendment with <br />Canyon Grille, and authorization of payment to Ramsey County for office space rental. He stated <br />that it is anticipated that these items would be presented to the City Council for consideration and <br />approval on September 12, 2005. He indicated that the construction would begin sometime after <br />October 2, 2005 and would be completed in Apri12006. <br />Council Member Thomas stated that one item she didn't notice in the documentation was what <br />projects have been set up, the must haves, how they would re-evaluate the project and a priority <br />list of the project. <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that there would be line items for each item and would be <br />reviewed when the bids are returned. He explained that if items are deemed to high they would <br />consider removing them from the bid at that time. He stated that at this point in time there is <br />only one bid alternate and that is for the front entranceway to do the tower design. He explained <br />that this is considered to be more cosmetic change as opposed to dealing with energy savings or <br />the disability act. He stated that all items would be broken down within the bid. <br />Mayor Marty referenced the tower design and asked why it was included, as it was already <br />removed. He stated that it was his understanding that they were not going to fix the vestibule. <br />Public Works Director Lee explained that they kept it in the packet as a bid alternate. He <br />referenced A201 and explained that the base bid, as it is written, shows the vestibule as being <br />